On Friday 01 Jan 2016 10:41:40 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Friday 01 January 2016 10:26:05 Mick wrote:
> > ... my kmail2 still seems to be functioning properly and without any major
> > problems so far. :-)
>
> What, not even duplicates? I'm still getting a dozen a day.
Hi Peter,
I think your
On Friday 01 January 2016 10:26:05 Mick wrote:
> ... my kmail2 still seems to be functioning properly and without any major
> problems so far. :-)
What, not even duplicates? I'm still getting a dozen a day.
--
Rgds
Peter
"J. Roeleveld" writes:
> On Wednesday, December 30, 2015 09:32:55 PM lee wrote:
>> "J. Roeleveld" writes:
>> > On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 08:03:25 PM Mick wrote:
>> >> On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 17:37:25 lee wrote:
>> >> > Are we at the point where users
On Thursday 31 Dec 2015 16:28:36 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thursday, December 31, 2015 01:50:43 PM Mick wrote:
> > On Thursday 31 Dec 2015 11:14:48 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > So, I'm reading the fine manual again, but I find myself asking questions
> > like ... how do I do this MySQL command on
On Friday 01 Jan 2016 13:06:55 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Thanks for your thoughts Mick. I think most of my problems have persisted
> through many iterations from the early days of KMail-2. At any rate, I've
> just deleted the whole KMail structure once more and reimported from
> archive and so
On Friday 01 January 2016 14:25:17 Mick wrote:
> On Friday 01 Jan 2016 13:06:55 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > Thanks for your thoughts Mick. I think most of my problems have
> > persisted
> > through many iterations from the early days of KMail-2. At any rate,
> > I've
> > just deleted the whole KMail
On Friday 01 January 2016 11:47:16 Mick wrote:
> On Friday 01 Jan 2016 10:41:40 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Friday 01 January 2016 10:26:05 Mick wrote:
> > > ... my kmail2 still seems to be functioning properly and without any
> > > major problems so far. :-)
> >
> > What, not even duplicates?
On Friday, January 01, 2016 03:58:18 PM Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Friday 01 January 2016 14:25:17 Mick wrote:
> > On Friday 01 Jan 2016 13:06:55 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > Thanks for your thoughts Mick. I think most of my problems have
> > > persisted
> > > through many iterations from the early
On Wednesday, December 30, 2015 07:30:49 PM Mick wrote:
> On 29 December 2015 at 17:51, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 04:34:33 PM Mick wrote:
> > > Can you please advise what GRANTS did you use to create a dedicated
> > > postgresql user for akonadi?
>
On Thursday 31 Dec 2015 11:14:48 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 30, 2015 07:30:49 PM Mick wrote:
> > Having been away from postgres for the best part of 7 years now, it is a
> > struggle to find my feet again. As a result I have been chasing my tail
> > on
> > this task today, not
On Wednesday, December 30, 2015 09:32:55 PM lee wrote:
> "J. Roeleveld" writes:
> > On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 08:03:25 PM Mick wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 17:37:25 lee wrote:
> >> > Are we at the point where users are accepting to have to install and
> >> > maintain
On Thursday, December 31, 2015 01:50:43 PM Mick wrote:
> On Thursday 31 Dec 2015 11:14:48 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 30, 2015 07:30:49 PM Mick wrote:
> > > Having been away from postgres for the best part of 7 years now, it is a
> > > struggle to find my feet again. As a
On 29 December 2015 at 17:51, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 04:34:33 PM Mick wrote:
>
> > Can you please advise what GRANTS did you use to create a dedicated
> > postgresql user for akonadi?
>
> Grants?
>
Yes, in the sense that the akonadi user will
"J. Roeleveld" writes:
> On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 08:03:25 PM Mick wrote:
>> On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 17:37:25 lee wrote:
>> > Are we at the point where users are accepting to have to install and
>> > maintain a fully fledged RDBMS just for a single application which
>> >
On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 17:51:32 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 04:34:33 PM Mick wrote:
> > On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 14:18:20 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > > sqlite is nice, for single threaded applications.
> > > For anything more advanced, either a wrapper is required or something
>
On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 04:34:33 PM Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 14:18:20 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > sqlite is nice, for single threaded applications.
> > For anything more advanced, either a wrapper is required or something more
> > advanced needs to be used.
>
> I like sqlite because
Mick writes:
> On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 14:18:20 J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
>> sqlite is nice, for single threaded applications.
>> For anything more advanced, either a wrapper is required or something more
>> advanced needs to be used.
>
> I like sqlite because it is
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 06:40:58PM +, Mick wrote:
>
> Thank you very much Joost for holding my hand on this. Last question for the
> day: It seems that postgresql wants to install xemacs as a dependency ... o_O
>
>
> # emerge -uaDv emerge
On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 14:18:20 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> sqlite is nice, for single threaded applications.
> For anything more advanced, either a wrapper is required or something more
> advanced needs to be used.
I like sqlite because it is self-contained, embedded in the application that
uses it
On 29 December 2015 19:40:58 CET, Mick wrote:
>On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 17:51:32 J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 04:34:33 PM Mick wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 14:18:20 J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> > > sqlite is nice, for single threaded applications.
On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 17:37:25 lee wrote:
> Are we at the point where users are accepting to have to install and
> maintain a fully fledged RDBMS just for a single application which
> doesn't even need a database in the first place?
Yes, a sad state of affairs indeed. I was hoping for the last
On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 18:49:03 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On 29 December 2015 19:40:58 CET, Mick wrote:
> >On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 17:51:32 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 04:34:33 PM Mick wrote:
> >> > On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 14:18:20 J. Roeleveld
On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 07:43:07 PM Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 18:49:03 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On 29 December 2015 19:40:58 CET, Mick wrote:
> > No. You are trying to emerge 'emerge'.
> > (Check the commandline :) )
> >
> > --
> > Joost
>
> Oops!
On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 08:03:25 PM Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 17:37:25 lee wrote:
> > Are we at the point where users are accepting to have to install and
> > maintain a fully fledged RDBMS just for a single application which
> > doesn't even need a database in the first place?
>
On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 01:16:08 PM Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 12:39:18 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 10:51:57 AM Mick wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 10:20:23 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 09:53:24 AM Mick wrote:
> > > This
I am thinking of migrating my laptop from Kmail1 to Kmail2. I don't *really*
have to do this yet, but I'd rather attempt one more time to move to Kmail2
while not under duress, because bitrot or maintainers decisions may force my
hand sooner or later anyway.
I have made half a dozen attempts
On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 12:39:18 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 10:51:57 AM Mick wrote:
> > On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 10:20:23 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 09:53:24 AM Mick wrote:
> > This is good to know. An earlier akonadi bug would actually delete
On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 09:53:24 AM Mick wrote:
> Have you been able to use Kmail2 reliably on a *laptop*? What problems have
> you experienced? Has intermittent network availability caused loss of
> messages? Any gotchas and workarounds? Any suggestions?
I have been using Kmail2 for
On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 10:20:23 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 09:53:24 AM Mick wrote:
> > Have you been able to use Kmail2 reliably on a *laptop*? What problems
> > have you experienced? Has intermittent network availability caused loss
> > of messages? Any gotchas and
On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 10:51:57 AM Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 10:20:23 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 09:53:24 AM Mick wrote:
> > > Have you been able to use Kmail2 reliably on a *laptop*? What problems
> > > have you experienced? Has intermittent network
30 matches
Mail list logo