On 10/25/2014 12:45 PM, Michael Orlitzky m...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 10/25/2014 09:57 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 10/7/2014 6:03 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 22:56:28 Mike Gilbert wrote:
Quite the opposite. Ideally, you should remove the PORTDIR setting
from
On 27/10/2014 17:45, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 10/25/2014 12:45 PM, Michael Orlitzky m...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 10/25/2014 09:57 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 10/7/2014 6:03 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 22:56:28 Mike Gilbert wrote:
Quite the opposite. Ideally, you
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27/10/2014 17:45, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 10/25/2014 12:45 PM, Michael Orlitzky m...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 10/25/2014 09:57 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 10/7/2014 6:03 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday
On Saturday 25 October 2014 12:45:05 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 10/25/2014 09:57 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 10/7/2014 6:03 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 22:56:28 Mike Gilbert wrote:
Quite the opposite. Ideally, you should remove the PORTDIR setting
from
On 10/7/2014 6:03 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 22:56:28 Mike Gilbert wrote:
Quite the opposite. Ideally, you should remove the PORTDIR setting
from make.conf. repos.conf is the newer, more flexible way to
configure it.
Unfortunately, that will break some
On 10/25/2014 09:57 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 10/7/2014 6:03 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 22:56:28 Mike Gilbert wrote:
Quite the opposite. Ideally, you should remove the PORTDIR setting
from make.conf. repos.conf is the newer, more flexible way to
configure
On Saturday 25 Oct 2014 17:45:05 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 10/25/2014 09:57 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 10/7/2014 6:03 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 22:56:28 Mike Gilbert wrote:
Quite the opposite. Ideally, you should remove the PORTDIR setting
from
On 10/25/2014 01:49 PM, Mick wrote:
I haven't touched this on my systems yet. As a matter of fact, I totally
forgot about it!
(Old age creeps up on you) :-p
I haven't bothered with it either, I really like being able to do:
PORTDIR=$REPOS/gentoo-x86 PORTDIR_OVERLAY= emerge -1
On 10/7/2014 5:56 PM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
Quite the opposite. Ideally, you should remove the PORTDIR setting
from make.conf. repos.conf is the newer, more flexible way to
configure it.
Ok, did I miss a news item on this?
Is this discussed in detail somewhere?
Afternoon all,
As a step towards exporting my portage tree over NFS I decided to move
/usr/portage to /var/portage, but leave /usr/portage/packages and
/usr/portage/distfiles where they are.
This is how it looks now:
$ grep DIR= /etc/portage/make.conf
DISTDIR=/usr/portage/distfiles
On 8 October 2014 1:09:54 AM AEST, Peter Humphrey pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk wrote:
Afternoon all,
As a step towards exporting my portage tree over NFS I decided to move
/usr/portage to /var/portage, but leave /usr/portage/packages and
/usr/portage/distfiles where they are.
This is how it looks
On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 16:09:54 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
This seems to work OK, except for eix-update, which gives me this:
$ eix-update
Reading Portage settings ..
Building database (/var/cache/eix/portage.eix) ..
[0] gentoo /var/portage/ (cache: metadata-md5-or-flat)
Reading
On Wednesday 08 October 2014 01:29:59 Bruce Schultz wrote:
Check /etc/portage/repos.conf
That's it! Many thanks, Bruce.
--
Regards
Peter
On 2014-10-07 17:09, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Afternoon all,
As a step towards exporting my portage tree over NFS I decided to move
/usr/portage to /var/portage, but leave /usr/portage/packages and
/usr/portage/distfiles where they are.
This is how it looks now:
$ grep DIR=
On 2014-10-07 17:57, Tomas Mozes wrote:
On 2014-10-07 17:09, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Afternoon all,
As a step towards exporting my portage tree over NFS I decided to move
/usr/portage to /var/portage, but leave /usr/portage/packages and
/usr/portage/distfiles where they are.
This is how it
On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 16:39:11 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Check /etc/portage/repos.conf
That's it! Many thanks, Bruce.
Indeed. That directory was either empty or absent on all my systems.
copying repos.conf from /usr/share/portage and modifying the path got rid
of the message.
--
Neil
On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 17:08:11 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 16:39:11 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Check /etc/portage/repos.conf
That's it! Many thanks, Bruce.
Indeed. That directory was either empty or absent on all my systems.
copying repos.conf from /usr/share/portage
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 17:08:11 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 16:39:11 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Check /etc/portage/repos.conf
That's it! Many thanks, Bruce.
Indeed. That directory was either empty or
On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 22:56:28 Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 17:08:11 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 16:39:11 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Check /etc/portage/repos.conf
That's it! Many
19 matches
Mail list logo
