Am Mon, 4 May 2015 21:33:53 +0200
schrieb Marc Joliet :
> Oh wow, I completely forgot about this open thread. In my defense, I had to
> move out two (or was it three?) days after I started the thread, and didn't
> have
> internet again until over a month later.
>
> Am Wed, 13 Aug 2014 07:30:01
Oh wow, I completely forgot about this open thread. In my defense, I had to
move out two (or was it three?) days after I started the thread, and didn't have
internet again until over a month later.
Am Wed, 13 Aug 2014 07:30:01 +0530
schrieb Nilesh Govindrajan :
[...]
> Having tried this feature,
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Marc Joliet wrote:
> Hi list
>
> For the longest time I've had portage configured to use the sqlite metadata
> cache backend as per an old HOWTO [0], however, I thought that it would be a
> good idea to revisit that decision.
>
> Now apparently, this was supposed
Hi list
For the longest time I've had portage configured to use the sqlite metadata
cache backend as per an old HOWTO [0], however, I thought that it would be a
good idea to revisit that decision.
Now apparently, this was supposed to speed up portage, although even that
depends. For instance, [0
4 matches
Mail list logo
