On 2016-05-13, Grant Edwards wrote:
> Well, I had never tried 4.9.3, and I'd been using 4.6 without problems
> for some time, so keeping 4.6 seemed like the safe way to go. I still
> don't understand what broke 4.6.
I must have been using 4.9 for a while and then switched back to 4.6
when I ran
On 14/05/16 06:35, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2016-05-13, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
>
>> I have not seen it mentioned, but did you run "fix_libtool_files.sh"
>> after changing gcc versions?
>
> You mean after I installed the binary 4.9.3 package and told
> gcc-config to switch from 4.6 to 4.9.3?
>
>
On 2016-05-13, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> I have not seen it mentioned, but did you run "fix_libtool_files.sh"
> after changing gcc versions?
You mean after I installed the binary 4.9.3 package and told
gcc-config to switch from 4.6 to 4.9.3?
No, I didn't.
According to https://wiki.gentoo.org/wik
On 14/05/16 06:18, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2016-05-13, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
>
>>> So, I uninstalled gcc 4.9 and all older versions except 4.6.
>>
>> Ouch! I was asking what you had, not suggesting removing anything yet.
>> I would've recommended removing the old versions and keeping 4.
On 2016-05-13, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
>> So, I uninstalled gcc 4.9 and all older versions except 4.6.
>
> Ouch! I was asking what you had, not suggesting removing anything yet.
> I would've recommended removing the old versions and keeping 4.9.3 if
> anything.
Well, I had never tried 4.9.
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 08:25:14PM +, Grant Edwards wrote
> AFAICT, you are suddenly not allowed to have gcc 4.9 installed
> alongside any older versions -- even though they're supposedly in
> slots.
>
> This is odd, because my system has had 4.9.whatever along with 3-4
> older versions for so
On 2016-05-13, Willie M wrote:
So, I uninstalled gcc 4.9 and all older versions except 4.6.
> 4.9 most likely works if it is installed. Just have to tell gentoo to
> use it.
>
> gcc-config -l
$ gcc-config -l
[1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.6.4 *
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards
On 05/13/2016 02:24 PM, Willie M wrote:
> On 05/13/2016 01:43 PM, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
>> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 08:25:14PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
>>>
>>> So, I uninstalled gcc 4.9 and all older versions except 4.6.
>>>
>>> I then removed 4.6 from the world file (but left it installed).
>>
On 05/13/2016 01:43 PM, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 08:25:14PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
>>
>> So, I uninstalled gcc 4.9 and all older versions except 4.6.
>>
>> I then removed 4.6 from the world file (but left it installed).
>>
>> emerge is now happy and willing to upgrade
On 2016-05-13, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 08:25:14PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
>>
>> So, I uninstalled gcc 4.9 and all older versions except 4.6.
>>
>> I then removed 4.6 from the world file (but left it installed).
>>
>> emerge is now happy and willing to upgrade gcc f
On 2016-05-13, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 13 May 2016 19:34:18 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> Is one no longer allowed to have multiple gcc versions insalled? It
>> seemd to be allowed earlier today...
>
> That's right, see the "A Glitch in the Matrix..." thread, particularly
> Jonath
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 08:25:14PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
> So, I uninstalled gcc 4.9 and all older versions except 4.6.
>
> I then removed 4.6 from the world file (but left it installed).
>
> emerge is now happy and willing to upgrade gcc from 4.6 to 4.9 -- but
> it can't: now the build
On Fri, 13 May 2016 19:34:18 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
> Is one no longer allowed to have multiple gcc versions insalled? It
> seemd to be allowed earlier today...
That's right, see the "A Glitch in the Matrix..." thread, particularly
Jonathan's posts, for enlightenment.
--
Neil Bothw
On 05/13/2016 01:25 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
> AFAICT, you are suddenly not allowed to have gcc 4.9 installed
> alongside any older versions -- even though they're supposedly in
> slots.
>
> This is odd, because my system has had 4.9.whatever along with 3-4
> older versions for some time and been
AFAICT, you are suddenly not allowed to have gcc 4.9 installed
alongside any older versions -- even though they're supposedly in
slots.
This is odd, because my system has had 4.9.whatever along with 3-4
older versions for some time and been perfectly happy.
So, I uninstalled gcc 4.9 and all older
On 2016-05-13, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
> Do you have gcc-4.5.4, gcc-4.3.6, and gcc-4.6.4 in "world"?
Yes (I did).
> If so, why?
Because at one time or another have have needed specific versions of
gcc for building something.
Is one no longer allowed to have multiple gcc versions insal
On 2016-05-13, Willie M wrote:
> On 05/13/2016 12:16 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
> I have no idea but I seen that star and thought about that it might be
> that reason. It also wants to reinstall gcc-4.5 so make sure you
> uninstall that.
A couple hours ago, my system was perfectly happy with the
On 05/13/2016 12:16 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2016-05-13, Willie M wrote:
>
>> It looks like the multislot use flag has changed. I think that is what
>> the star means.
>
> I had it enabled temporarily, but emerge then failed on the first
> package it tried to build (gcc-4.5).
>
> Then deci
On 2016-05-13, Willie M wrote:
> It looks like the multislot use flag has changed. I think that is what
> the star means.
I had it enabled temporarily, but emerge then failed on the first
package it tried to build (gcc-4.5).
Then decided I shouldn't need it and removed it, since it seemed to be
19 matches
Mail list logo
