I agree that your script is nice and simple, and hence less prone to
errors. I coded mine in c++ because I use it not only for a machine
type watchdog, but also a task based watchdog that reboots the machine
based on certain tasks living or not. Each task has to register with
the watchdog
Iain Buchanan wrote:
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 12:42 -0400, Steven Lembark wrote:
I tried ALT + SysRq + EISUB today on my MythTV backend server which
has been crashing lately. Unfortunately it's crashing so badly that
even at the server's keyboard this didn't work.
I guess my weekend fate of
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 13:28 -0400, Steven Lembark wrote:
Iain Buchanan wrote:
watchdogs are nice, and linux makes them ultra-easy to program, but of
course if your watchdog task dies, then the machine effectively hits the
reset button for you - no nice shutdown whatsoever! (Which is what
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 12:42 -0400, Steven Lembark wrote:
I tried ALT + SysRq + EISUB today on my MythTV backend server which
has been crashing lately. Unfortunately it's crashing so badly that
even at the server's keyboard this didn't work.
I guess my weekend fate of building a new
I tried ALT + SysRq + EISUB today on my MythTV backend server which
has been crashing lately. Unfortunately it's crashing so badly that
even at the server's keyboard this didn't work.
I guess my weekend fate of building a new server is sealed...
Have fun.
Check out motherboards with
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:40:37 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote:
Neil even proposed ALT +
SysRq + EISUB, to be sure everything is killed, sync'd and
unmounted.
Which might or might not work. But note that I was
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 14:05:42 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
I tried ALT + SysRq + EISUB today on my MythTV backend server which
has been crashing lately. Unfortunately it's crashing so badly that
even at the server's keyboard this didn't work.
Do you have CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y in your kernel config?
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 14:05:42 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
I tried ALT + SysRq + EISUB today on my MythTV backend server which
has been crashing lately. Unfortunately it's crashing so badly that
even at the server's
Liviu Andronic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any potential harms to the hardware / system in case one
tends to abuse (i.e. use more often than necessary) of this command?
You're not shutting down the system in a clean way. Because of
this, filesystem and/or applications might get corrupt
Am Mittwoch, 2. April 2008 schrieb ext Michael Schmarck:
You're not shutting down the system in a clean way.
You're not? I thought that's the purpose of the whole thing?
Bye...
Dirk
--
Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408
Configuration Manager | Fax: +49 (0)211
ยท Dirk Heinrichs [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am Mittwoch, 2. April 2008 schrieb ext Michael Schmarck:
Dirk Heinrichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 2. April 2008 schrieb ext Michael Schmarck:
You're not shutting down the system in a clean way.
You're not? I thought that's the purpose of
On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:40:37 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote:
Neil even proposed ALT +
SysRq + EISUB, to be sure everything is killed, sync'd and
unmounted.
Which might or might not work. But note that I was also talking
about applications being in a corrupted state (the database
12 matches
Mail list logo
