On Saturday 28 November 2009 19:42:33 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Saturday 28 November 2009 21:32:28 Mick wrote:
> > > I suppose one could make several useful -meta packages DEPEND on kate,
> > > as many users want kate and do not want the entire kdesdk package. But
> > > that causes the same app to
On Saturday 28 November 2009 21:32:28 Mick wrote:
> > I suppose one could make several useful -meta packages DEPEND on kate, as
> > many users want kate and do not want the entire kdesdk package. But that
> > causes the same app to appear in more than one -meta package and the
> > devs seem to wa
On Saturday 28 November 2009 13:22:14 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Saturday 28 November 2009 02:01:22 Mick wrote:
> > > To find out what depends on kate, kweather and kfloppy, use the correct
> > > portage tool:
> > >
> > > a...@nazgul ~ $ equery depends -a kate
> > > * Searching for kate ...
> > > k
On Saturday 28 November 2009 02:01:22 Mick wrote:
> > To find out what depends on kate, kweather and kfloppy, use the correct
> > portage tool:
> >
> > a...@nazgul ~ $ equery depends -a kate
> > * Searching for kate ...
> > kde-base/kdesdk-meta-4.3.1 (>=kde-base/kate-4.3.1:4.3[kdeprefix=])
> > kd
On Friday 27 November 2009 15:53:41 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Friday 27 November 2009 17:27:30 James wrote:
> > Mick gmail.com> writes:
> > > Hmm, I thought that kweather, kate and kfloppy were brought in by some
> > > meta or other. It seems that I'll have to install these on their own?
> >
> >
On Friday 27 November 2009 23:07:25 Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Thursday 26 November 2009 19:34:34 James wrote:
> >> kde-4.3.1 went smooth, except
> >> for I have to manually removed all the kde-3.5 packages.
> >> It had kde-meta-3.5.10. Is there some syntax or a better
> >>
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Thursday 26 November 2009 19:34:34 James wrote:
>> kde-4.3.1 went smooth, except
>> for I have to manually removed all the kde-3.5 packages.
>> It had kde-meta-3.5.10. Is there some syntax or a better
>> method to insure all the kde-3.5.x packages are removed,
>> without
On Friday 27 November 2009 17:27:30 James wrote:
> Mick gmail.com> writes:
> > Hmm, I thought that kweather, kate and kfloppy were brought in by some
> > meta or other. It seems that I'll have to install these on their own?
>
> Hello Mick,
>
> I'm just not certain any more exactly which package
Mick gmail.com> writes:
> Hmm, I thought that kweather, kate and kfloppy were brought in by some
> meta or other. It seems that I'll have to install these on their own?
Hello Mick,
I'm just not certain any more exactly which packages belong to
which meta(kde) package. I think they are added a
2009/11/26 James :
> Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>> grep kde /var/lib/portage/world
>
> only kde-meta in there
>
>>emerge -a --depclean
>
>
> yep, just making sure as I thought there might be a
> very special syntax to remove all kde 3.5.*
>
> I used revdep-rebuild and emerge -uDNvp w
Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes:
> grep kde /var/lib/portage/world
only kde-meta in there
>emerge -a --depclean
yep, just making sure as I thought there might be a
very special syntax to remove all kde 3.5.*
I used revdep-rebuild and emerge -uDNvp world to get the
list of 3.5 packages,
11 matches
Mail list logo
