Re: [gentoo-user] Re: LINGUAS, L10N, and local-gen

»Q« wrote: > On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 12:20:25 -0500 > Dale wrote: > >> »Q« wrote: >>> On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:18:00 -0500 >>> Dale wrote: >>> I started out on this thread helping the OP get his set up correctly. Why make someone else use trial

[gentoo-user] Re: LINGUAS, L10N, and local-gen

On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 12:20:25 -0500 Dale wrote: > »Q« wrote: > > On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:18:00 -0500 > > Dale wrote: > > > >> I started out on this thread helping the OP get his set up > >> correctly. Why make someone else use trial and error like I

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: LINGUAS, L10N, and local-gen

»Q« wrote: > On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:18:00 -0500 > Dale wrote: > >> I started out on this thread helping the OP get his set up >> correctly. Why make someone else use trial and error like I did when >> all I had to do was post > Refraining from posting would *not* have

[gentoo-user] Re: LINGUAS, L10N, and local-gen

On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:18:00 -0500 Dale wrote: > I started out on this thread helping the OP get his set up > correctly. Why make someone else use trial and error like I did when > all I had to do was post Refraining from posting would *not* have forced the OP to use

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: LINGUAS, L10N, and local-gen

»Q« wrote: > On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 09:57:57 -0500 > Dale wrote: > >> Neil Bothwick wrote: >>> On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 18:47:11 -0500, Dale wrote: >>> I read the news item and was confused. I read it again and was even more confused. After the third time, I didn't see

[gentoo-user] Re: LINGUAS, L10N, and local-gen

On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 09:57:57 -0500 Dale wrote: > Neil Bothwick wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 18:47:11 -0500, Dale wrote: > > > >> I read the news item and was confused. I read it again and was > >> even more confused. After the third time, I didn't see any point > >>