On 9/29/2015 8:02 PM, James wrote:
> Another point of concern. When radically changing infrastructure like this,
> why not just do the entire thing under a new DNS and have both online for a
> while, until the new site if vetted and the actual real bugs worked out?
On 01/10/2015 13:22, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 9/29/2015 8:02 PM, James wrote:
>> Another point of concern. When radically changing infrastructure like this,
>> why not just do the entire thing under a new DNS and have both online for a
>> while, until the new site if vetted
Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes:
> On 29/09/2015 22:19, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On 29 September 2015 22:00:58 CEST, Tanstaafl
libertytrek.org> wrote:
> > Most companies I deal with wouldn't even let the people responsible for
the databases to reconfigure the
> storage for said database
3 matches
Mail list logo