[gentoo-user] Re: New samba-3.0.25c broken?

2007-11-26 Thread Sven Köhler
>> Samba 3.0.24 works like charm. Just switched back to it. > > But watch out, it has a huge security problem: > http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200711-29.xml Yeah, but i've got no time right now, to analyse the problems with 3.0.27a. I've run it in debug mode and so on - but i found

[gentoo-user] Re: New samba-3.0.25c broken?

2007-11-26 Thread Alex Schuster
Sven Köhler writes: Samba 3.0.24 works like charm. Just switched back to it. But watch out, it has a huge security problem: http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200711-29.xml Wonko -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[gentoo-user] Re: New samba-3.0.25c broken?

2007-11-26 Thread Sven Köhler
>> In addition, the mount.cifs binary is missing. So i cannot mount via >> CIFS anymore. Samba ebuild is VERY broken :-( > > The ebuild is not broken, you just didn't read what it told you > > "The mount/umount.cifs helper applications are not included anymore. > Please install net-fs/mount-cifs

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: New samba-3.0.25c broken?

2007-11-26 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:50:38 +0100, Sven Köhler wrote: > In addition, the mount.cifs binary is missing. So i cannot mount via > CIFS anymore. Samba ebuild is VERY broken :-( The ebuild is not broken, you just didn't read what it told you "The mount/umount.cifs helper applications are not include

[gentoo-user] Re: New samba-3.0.25c broken?

2007-11-26 Thread Sven Köhler
> Hi. I just tried to update to the new "stable" samba 3.025c and noticed two > problems: > > - the init script does not work (known bug #191647) > > - after fixing the init script, the Windows box (XP SP2) can no longer > connect to shared directories despite the new server being visible and > b