Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage wrongly blocking an update

2023-01-15 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Sunday, 15 January 2023 10:03:19 GMT Nuno Silva wrote:

> From a quick look (I might have overlooked something), it sounds like it
> has to be manually uninstalled beforehand (so, precisely what you did
> 
> :-) ).
> 
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=834503

Thanks Nuno. Interesting bug, too.

-- 
Regards,
Peter.






[gentoo-user] Re: Portage wrongly blocking an update

2023-01-15 Thread Nuno Silva
On 2023-01-15, Peter Humphrey wrote:

> Hello list,
>
> Today's update of my LAN server failed to resolve a block. It said it 
> couldn't 
> emerge net-proxy/squid-5.7 because of:
>
> [blocks B  ]  net-proxy/squid-5.7)
> [,,,]
> (net-proxy/squid-5.7:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by
> net-proxy/squid required by @apps
>
> That's all I got. No sign of what required  the < had come from.

It came from the squid ebuild itself.

>From a quick look (I might have overlooked something), it sounds like it
has to be manually uninstalled beforehand (so, precisely what you did
:-) ).

https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=834503

> The apps set does not specify a version, and no other package depends on 
> squid, so I removed it with emerge -C, then restarted the update, which ran 
> to 
> completion.
>
> It seems to me that portage should have been able to do the same, and upgrade 
> squid smoothly.

-- 
Nuno Silva