On 2020-03-21 01:05, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> > No. Here is my make.conf:
>
> Nothing unusual, indeed. Could you please share the ebuild that has
> the behavior? The issue might be there.
Definitely not, it's just the latest official net-mail/mu with a single
trivial change (remove the
On ven. 20 mars 09:16:34 2020, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> > Do you have hardening or something like that?
>
> No. Here is my make.conf:
Nothing unusual, indeed. Could you please share the ebuild that has the
behavior? The issue might be there.
--
Alarig
On 2020-03-20 10:10, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> > Assuming it's /usr/lib/portage/python3.6/ebuild-helpers/dobin, mine
> > contains as the last significant chunk the following:
> >
> > for x in "$@" ; do
> > if [[ -e ${x} ]] ; then
> > install -m0755 -o ${PORTAGE_INST_UID:-0}
On ven. 20 mars 00:07:45 2020, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2020-03-19 20:18, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
>
> > Yes and it has always worked. `dobin` shouldn’t try to chown in theory,
> > it’s done during the merge.
>
> Assuming it's /usr/lib/portage/python3.6/ebuild-helpers/dobin, mine
> contains as the
On 2020-03-19 20:18, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> Yes and it has always worked. `dobin` shouldn’t try to chown in theory,
> it’s done during the merge.
Assuming it's /usr/lib/portage/python3.6/ebuild-helpers/dobin, mine
contains as the last significant chunk the following:
for x in "$@" ; do
On jeu. 19 mars 11:17:51 2020, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> But have you tried the _install_ step this way? I don't mean the "real"
> install into the filesystem, just the staged install that "ebuild foo
> install" does.
>
> I get:
>
> >>> Install net-mail/mu-1.3.9 into
On 2020-03-19 08:40, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> alarig@pikachu ~ % ls -lhd /var/tmp/portage/
> drwxrwxr-x 8 portage portage 4.0K Mar 19 08:37 /var/tmp/portage/
> alarig@pikachu ~ % ebuild
> /var/db/repos/SwordArMor/net-misc/FORT-validator/FORT-validator-1.2.0.ebuild
> prepare
> *
7 matches
Mail list logo
