* Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
I think what Enrico is getting at is storing the new config files
somewhere else, instead of the original path with the name prefixed
by ._cfg.
ACK.
Such a move would break {etc,conf,cfg}-update for no real benefit.
What is the point of including
* Remy Blank remy.bl...@pobox.com wrote:
Put your /etc under SVN, or Mercurial, or whatever revision control
system du jour. Bonus points if you manage to store file and directory
permissions in there as well.
Is there a way to tell portage to conf-protected files under
some prefix ? This
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:37 on Wednesday 10 November 2010, Enrico
Weigelt did opine thusly:
* Remy Blank remy.bl...@pobox.com wrote:
Put your /etc under SVN, or Mercurial, or whatever revision control
system du jour. Bonus points if you manage to store file and directory
* Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:37 on Wednesday 10 November 2010, Enrico
Weigelt did opine thusly:
* Remy Blank remy.bl...@pobox.com wrote:
Put your /etc under SVN, or Mercurial, or whatever revision control
system du jour. Bonus
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:02 on Thursday 11 November 2010, Enrico
Weigelt did opine thusly:
* Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:37 on Wednesday 10 November 2010,
Enrico
Weigelt did opine thusly:
* Remy Blank remy.bl...@pobox.com
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 01:18:08 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
According to the manpage, this only tells which directories should
be config-protect'ed. What I need is that these files should be put
under some prefix (w/ the same hierachy/names) instead of renamed
to ._cfg*.
What version of
Mark Knecht wrote:
My worry with etc-update is that I know, for the most part, all the
files I modify when doing an install so I know what to look for when
I'm selecting files to replace myself. However with that tool there's
a point where you might have 20 files that need updating, you look
On 11/04/2010 06:43 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
Hi,
When starting VMware-Player I get the following message:
The host's Linux kernel yield() functionality is disabled.
Multiprocessor virtual machines exhibit degraded performance without
yield(). Choose 'OK' to enable the sysctl
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote:
On 11/04/2010 06:43 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
Hi,
When starting VMware-Player I get the following message:
The host's Linux kernel yield() functionality is disabled.
Multiprocessor virtual machines exhibit degraded
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:03 on Thursday 04 November 2010, Mark
Knecht did opine thusly:
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote:
On 11/04/2010 06:43 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
Hi,
When starting VMware-Player I get the following message:
The
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 21:20:25 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I find conf-update much better than dispatch-conf and etc-update. It's
curses- based and displays the modified files in a tree structure by
directory. Very intuitive display. And it's smart enough to know to
just apply changes to files
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 21:20:25 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I find conf-update much better than dispatch-conf and etc-update. It's
curses- based and displays the modified files in a tree structure by
directory. Very
On 4/11/2010, at 7:20pm, Alan McKinnon wrote:
...
I find conf-update much better than dispatch-conf and etc-update. It's curses-
based and displays the modified files in a tree structure by directory. Very
intuitive display. And it's smart enough to know to just apply changes to
files that
I will have to try conf-update - its interface sounds nice.
If you run X, then cfg-update, configured to use meld for the
diffing/editing via GUI, is nice and clear.
Am 04.11.2010 20:20, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
Try conf-update, you might like it. It's a good middle-ground, I find.
I like cfg-update [*]. I use it with kdiff3, but you can use about any
merge tool you like, be it GUI or CLI. Looks quite sophisticated to me.
I only worry that it is not being
On 11/04/2010 09:03 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de wrote:
On 11/04/2010 06:43 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
[...]
Looking around at VMware's site they recommend changing
/etc/sysctl.conf to enable the feature:
[...]
I can do that
16 matches
Mail list logo
