Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Which openoffice

2008-05-19 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Uwe Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 05 May 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: OOo has just got to be the most fscked-up ebuild I've ever seen. I think you are being unfair towards the gentoo developers. It isn't the ebuild but OOo's build system (and source). The gentoo devs just

[gentoo-user] Re: Which openoffice

2008-05-05 Thread Francesco Talamona
2 - how long does it take to compile openoffice-bin on a PC with 2 GB Ram and a AMD Athlon-64 3200+ Processor? On my 2003 machine (AMD 2500+) 5 hours ; on my 2007 machine (Intel Core-2 Duo 6700) 2 hours . Those are the timings of openoffice, openoffice-bin doesn't get compiled, it is

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Which openoffice

2008-05-05 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Monday 05 May 2008, Francesco Talamona wrote: 2 - how long does it take to compile openoffice-bin on a PC with 2 GB Ram and a AMD Athlon-64 3200+ Processor? On my 2003 machine (AMD 2500+) 5 hours ; on my 2007 machine (Intel Core-2 Duo 6700) 2 hours . Those are the timings of

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Which openoffice

2008-05-05 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Monday 05 May 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote: On Monday 05 May 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: OOo has just got to be the most fscked-up ebuild I've ever seen. I think you are being unfair towards the gentoo developers. It isn't the ebuild but OOo's build system (and source). The gentoo devs just try