Re: [gentoo-user] Re: checking whether the C compiler works... no Oooops !!

2011-05-10 Thread Dale
Dale wrote: Here is a update. I been going back and forth with python-updater and revdep-rebuild and it just never seems to finish cleanly. I think it reached a stalemate. So, I'm doing a emerge -e world which will also upgrade KDE. Maybe this will get it going again. Dale :-) :-)

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: checking whether the C compiler works... no Oooops !!

2011-05-08 Thread Dale
Dale wrote: I already have --keep-going in make.conf. Good thought tho. Thing is, it errors before it even starts. Complains about blockers and the packages aren't even installed to block anything. Mostly KDE stuff too. I'm running the script and will see what it does. Maybe it will

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: checking whether the C compiler works... no Oooops !!

2011-05-07 Thread Andrea Conti
Well, this ain't good. Neither python-updater nor revdep-rebuild can complete. Either it is a missing package or some other error. Am I to the point where I have to reinstall? If you can't sort out the mess manually, try emerge -e system, then emerge -e world. You can also save some time by

[gentoo-user] Re: checking whether the C compiler works... no Oooops !!

2011-05-06 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 05/06/2011 11:28 AM, Dale wrote: Alan McKinnon wrote: This is usually CFLAGS and other bits of env stuff. There's probably a more meaningful error earlier in the build log. Can you post the full log for a failing file? Here is one: No, that's not it. It's this: !!! Please attach the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: checking whether the C compiler works... no Oooops !!

2011-05-06 Thread Dale
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: No, that's not it. It's this: !!! Please attach the following file when seeking support: !!! /var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/sandbox-2.4/work/build-default/config.log Hmmm. Thought it was the same. Here goes but it is lengthy: root@smoker / # cat

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: checking whether the C compiler works... no Oooops !!

2011-05-06 Thread justin
On 06/05/11 11:08, Dale wrote: That shed any light? Dale :-) :-) Yes it does /usr/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.4/cc1: error while loading shared libraries: libmpfr.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory you upgraded your mpfr. Now you have to

[gentoo-user] Re: checking whether the C compiler works... no Oooops !!

2011-05-06 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 05/06/2011 12:08 PM, Dale wrote: Nikos Chantziaras wrote: No, that's not it. It's this: !!! Please attach the following file when seeking support: !!! /var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/sandbox-2.4/work/build-default/config.log Hmmm. Thought it was the same. Here goes but it is lengthy: [...]

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: checking whether the C compiler works... no Oooops !!

2011-05-06 Thread Dale
justin wrote: On 06/05/11 11:08, Dale wrote: That shed any light? Dale :-) :-) Yes it does /usr/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.4/cc1: error while loading shared libraries: libmpfr.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory you upgraded your mpfr. Now

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: checking whether the C compiler works... no Oooops !!

2011-05-06 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 11:15 on Friday 06 May 2011, justin did opine thusly: On 06/05/11 11:08, Dale wrote: That shed any light? Dale :-) :-) Yes it does /usr/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.4/cc1: error while loading shared libraries: libmpfr.so.1: cannot open

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: checking whether the C compiler works... no Oooops !!

2011-05-06 Thread Dale
Dale wrote: justin wrote: On 06/05/11 11:08, Dale wrote: That shed any light? Dale :-) :-) Yes it does /usr/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.4/cc1: error while loading shared libraries: libmpfr.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory you upgraded your mpfr.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: checking whether the C compiler works... no Oooops !!

2011-05-06 Thread Dale
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 05/06/2011 12:08 PM, Dale wrote: Nikos Chantziaras wrote: No, that's not it. It's this: !!! Please attach the following file when seeking support: !!! /var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/sandbox-2.4/work/build-default/config.log Hmmm. Thought it was the same. Here goes

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: checking whether the C compiler works... no Oooops !!

2011-05-06 Thread Dale
Alan McKinnon wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 11:15 on Friday 06 May 2011, justin did opine thusly: On 06/05/11 11:08, Dale wrote: That shed any light? Dale :-) :-) Yes it does /usr/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.4/cc1: error while loading shared libraries:

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: checking whether the C compiler works... no Oooops !!

2011-05-06 Thread Albert Hopkins
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 12:18 +0200, Andrea Conti wrote: AFAIK in order to avoid this kind of breakage system ebuilds such as mpfr never delete old library versions; they just print a warning saying that the old library has been kept around and should be manually deleted after running

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: checking whether the C compiler works... no Oooops !!

2011-05-06 Thread Andrea Conti
/usr/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.4/cc1: error while loading shared libraries: libmpfr.so.1: cannot open shared object file Meaning, run revdep-rebuild :) Yeah, right. So revdep-rebuild does its thing, finds out that gcc is broken and tries to rebuild it with the broken gcc :) In this

[gentoo-user] Re: checking whether the C compiler works... no Oooops !!

2011-05-06 Thread walt
On 05/06/2011 12:45 AM, Dale wrote: checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc... gcc checking whether the C compiler works... no I know you have it fixed now, but just thought I'd mention that you will see the same error when compiling something in a directory where you don't have write privileges.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: checking whether the C compiler works... no Oooops !!

2011-05-06 Thread Dale
Dale wrote: On the list of things to do. Running python-updater now will run that next. Thanks. Dale :-) :-) Well, this ain't good. Neither python-updater nor revdep-rebuild can complete. Either it is a missing package or some other error. Am I to the point where I have to

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: checking whether the C compiler works... no Oooops !!

2011-05-06 Thread Dale
Albert Hopkins wrote: On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 12:18 +0200, Andrea Conti wrote: AFAIK in order to avoid this kind of breakage system ebuilds such as mpfr never delete old library versions; they just print a warning saying that the old library has been kept around and should be manually

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: checking whether the C compiler works... no Oooops !!

2011-05-06 Thread Alex Schuster
Dale writes: Dale wrote: On the list of things to do. Running python-updater now will run that next. Well, this ain't good. Neither python-updater nor revdep-rebuild can complete. Either it is a missing package or some other error. Am I to the point where I have to reinstall? Add

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: checking whether the C compiler works... no Oooops !!

2011-05-06 Thread Dale
Alex Schuster wrote: Dale writes: Dale wrote: On the list of things to do. Running python-updater now will run that next. Well, this ain't good. Neither python-updater nor revdep-rebuild can complete. Either it is a missing package or some other error. Am I to the

[gentoo-user] Re: checking whether the C compiler works... no Oooops !!

2011-05-06 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2011-05-06, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: P. S. One would think a Gentoo system could sit idle for a couple months without this sort of mess. It depends on which couple of months you happen to pick. ;) Most of the time a couple months is OK. Once in a while there will be several