On Mon, Dec 03 2018, Nuno Silva wrote:
> On 2018-12-02, allan gottlieb wrote:
>
>> On one of my stable amd64 systems, I just ran
>>
>> emerge --update --changed-use --with-bdeps=n --deep @world
>>
>> and received a list of 65 packages to merge (many gnome).
>>
>> The update completed and I was told
>>
>> !!! existing preserved libs:
> package: dev-libs/libcdio-2.0.0-r1
>> * - /usr/lib64/libcdio.so.16
>> * - /usr/lib64/libcdio.so.16.0.0
>> * used by /usr/bin/libcdio-paranoia (dev-libs/libcdio-paranoia-0.93_p1)
>> * used by /usr/lib64/libcdio_cdda.so.2.0.0
>> (dev-libs/libcdio-paranoia-0.93_p1)
>> * used by /usr/lib64/libcdio_paranoia.so.2.0.0
>> (dev-libs/libcdio-paranoia-0.93_p1)
>> * used by /usr/libexec/gvfsd-cdda (gnome-base/gvfs-1.32.2)
>> Use emerge @preserved-rebuild to rebuild packages using these libraries
>>
>> When I ran emerge --pretend @preserved-rebuild I was told to run
>> merge dev-qt/qtcore-5.11.1 which is ~amd64, which seems wrong.
>> The full output is below.
>> Can someone please explain what is happening.
>>
>> thanks,
>> allan
>>
>> E6430 ~ # emerge --pretend @preserved-rebuild
>> These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order:
>>
>> Calculating dependencies... done!
>> [ebuild R] gnome-base/gvfs-1.32.2
>> [ebuild R] dev-libs/libcdio-paranoia-0.93_p1
>> [nomerge ] gnome-base/gvfs-1.32.2
>> [nomerge ] sys-fs/udisks-2.7.4-r1
>> [nomerge ] sys-libs/libblockdev-2.14-r1
>> [nomerge ]dev-libs/volume_key-0.3.11
>> [nomerge ] app-crypt/gpgme-1.11.1
>> [nomerge ] dev-qt/qttest-5.9.6
>> [ebuild UD~] dev-qt/qtcore-5.9.6-r1 [5.11.1-r1]
>>
>> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
>> !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
>>
>> dev-qt/qtcore:5
>>
>> (dev-qt/qtcore-5.11.1-r1:5/5.11::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
>> ~dev-qt/qtcore-5.11.1 required by
>> (dev-qt/qtconcurrent-5.11.1:5/5.11::gentoo, installed)
>> ^ ^^
>>
>> (and 9 more with the same problem)
>>
>> (dev-qt/qtcore-5.9.6-r1:5/5.9::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled
>> in by
>> ~dev-qt/qtcore-5.9.6 required by (dev-qt/qttest-5.9.6:5/5.9::gentoo,
>> installed)
>> ^ ^
> [...]
>
> I would try upgrading qttest first (it is the one pulling
> qtcore-5.9.6{,-r1}, according to the output). Do you have any qttest
> 5.11.* version which is keyworded amd64 (and not ~amd64)?
>
> Here and on
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__packages.gentoo.org_packages_dev-2Dqt_qttest=DwIBAg=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ=_dyIY8xqg6BKCk8rhrlI7w=tDVBtLgUSC8n4dmctGhQkI9xdwjwHBxoPf_aN2VSQ5Q=LSfHPknOXSb0aGKfeCF56XaHMDSzxkFup5BhzVuijoI=,
> qttest-5.11.1 is amd64. Maybe the tree was in an inconsistent state when
> you last synced it?
>
> If you have qttest 5.11.1 in ~amd64 and you need a very quick fix, try
> adding it to package.accept_keywords and upgrading it. Otherwise, you
> might prefer to sync the portage tree again first.
>
> --
> Nuno Silva
>
>
I just did eix and indeed qttest 5.11.1 is amd64 (not ~amd64).
I upgraded it and now emerge @preserved-rebuild succeeds.
I did not resync, just emerging qttest did the trick.
Thank you.
allan gottlieb
