On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 00:32:01 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On this ~amd64 box portage 2.2x was hard-masked a day or two ago and I
was required to downgrade to sys-apps/portage-2.1.9.24. It seems that
the 2.2 branch is now only fit for 32-bit systems - there must really
be some hard problem in
On Thursday 04 November 2010 09:30:11 Neil Bothwick wrote:
They just changed from package masking to keyword masking, as noted
in the ChangeLog
I couldn't get emerge to show me the change log.
Remove the entry from /etc/portage/package.unmask and add it
to /etc/portage/package.keywords.
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:46 on Thursday 04 November 2010, Peter
Humphrey did opine thusly:
On Thursday 04 November 2010 09:30:11 Neil Bothwick wrote:
They just changed from package masking to keyword masking, as noted
in the ChangeLog
I couldn't get emerge to show me the change
Am 04.11.2010 17:46, schrieb Peter Humphrey:
As expected, that didn't help - this is a ~amd64 gentoo box, and so
everything is already emerged with the ~amd64 keyword. I still get a
missing-keyword error from emerge.
portage-2.2_rc67.ebuild has KEYWORDS=~sparc-fbsd ~x86-fbsd
As you can see
Am 04.11.2010 18:01, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
It's not package.keywords, it's package.accept_keywords.
Good to know, when and where was that announced?
Greetings
Sebastian Beßler
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 19:01:45 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
It's not package.keywords, it's package.accept_keywords. The old name
will be accepted for a while but I don't know when that warranty expires
I hadn't noticed that, but the portage man page still advocates the use
of either, and portage
On Thursday 04 November 2010 17:01:45 Alan McKinnon wrote:
It's not package.keywords, it's package.accept_keywords. The old name
will be accepted for a while but I don't know when that warranty
expires. Do this:
sys-apps/portage-**
in package.{accept_,}keywords
Apparently, though unproven, at 20:35 on Thursday 04 November 2010, Peter
Humphrey did opine thusly:
On Thursday 04 November 2010 17:01:45 Alan McKinnon wrote:
It's not package.keywords, it's package.accept_keywords. The old name
will be accepted for a while but I don't know when that
On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
sys-apps/portage-2.2_rc67
HTH
Francesco
I'll look forward to that going stable x86. Right now that means
sys-apps/portage-2.1.8.3
Actually 2.2_rc67 was removed recently.
ciao
Francesco
--
Linux Version
Francesco Talamona wrote:
On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
sys-apps/portage-2.2_rc67
HTH
Francesco
I'll look forward to that going stable x86. Right now that means
sys-apps/portage-2.1.8.3
Actually 2.2_rc67 was removed recently.
ciao
On Wednesday 03 November 2010 23:10:05 Dale wrote:
I synced this morning and I still got it.
[IP-] [ ] sys-apps/portage-2.2_rc67
On this ~amd64 box portage 2.2x was hard-masked a day or two ago and I
was required to downgrade to sys-apps/portage-2.1.9.24. It seems that
the 2.2 branch is
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Wednesday 03 November 2010 23:10:05 Dale wrote:
I synced this morning and I still got it.
[IP-] [ ] sys-apps/portage-2.2_rc67
On this ~amd64 box portage 2.2x was hard-masked a day or two ago and I
was required to downgrade to sys-apps/portage-2.1.9.24. It
On Tuesday 02 November 2010, Gary Golden wrote:
Hi, list.
I keep changes of my /etc with git and I would like to include
/var/lib/portage/world file into the repository.
Can I safely do:
mv /var/lib/portage/world /etc/portage
ln -s /etc/portage /var/lib/portage/world
Will portage
On 11/02/2010 03:05 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Right now I sit with 60+ SLES 9 machines that cannot be taken offline for any
reason, and EVERY SINGLE ONE has one giant filesystem...
How did this happen? The man in charge three managers ago thought this was a
cool way to configure critical
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:21 on Wednesday 03 November 2010, Francesco
Talamona did opine thusly:
On Tuesday 02 November 2010, Gary Golden wrote:
Hi, list.
I keep changes of my /etc with git and I would like to include
/var/lib/portage/world file into the repository.
Can I
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:49 on Wednesday 03 November 2010, walt did
opine thusly:
On 11/02/2010 03:05 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Right now I sit with 60+ SLES 9 machines that cannot be taken offline for
any reason, and EVERY SINGLE ONE has one giant filesystem...
How did this
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:21 on Wednesday 03 November 2010, Francesco
Talamona did opine thusly:
On Tuesday 02 November 2010, Gary Golden wrote:
Hi, list.
I keep changes of my /etc with git and I would like to include
/var/lib/portage/world file into
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Francesco Talamona
francesco.talam...@know.eu wrote:
On Tuesday 02 November 2010, Gary Golden wrote:
Hi, list.
I keep changes of my /etc with git and I would like to include
/var/lib/portage/world file into the repository.
Can I safely do:
mv
18 matches
Mail list logo
