On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 10:20:15AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, after a reiserfs3 disaster, I went back and stick to ext3.
I too have been using SLUB on my desktop since .22 was stable. No
problems, but no noticable speed increase. I'm also on ext3 aftar a
Reiserfs 3 disaster!
Mark
Hello Mark Somerville,
I too have been using SLUB on my desktop since .22 was stable. No
problems, but no noticable speed increase. I'm also on ext3 aftar a
Reiserfs 3 disaster!
I just found that my laptop no longer recognised USB devices, so I
went back to SLAB and all was well again.
--
Something I noticed with a laptop, power usage seemed to reduce using
slab over slub which was counter intuitive. Need to spend a few hours
and recheck - would be nice if some else can confirm it.
and I am back on reiserfs after an ext3 disaster(s).
YMMV :)
that was at least two years ago but
Selon Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sunday 19 August 2007 01:32:27 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Selon Volker Armin Hemmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Samstag, 18. August 2007, Mick wrote:
Which of the two is it suitable for a desktop?
SLAB
slub is still very experimental,
On Saturday 18 August 2007, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Samstag, 18. August 2007, Florian Philipp wrote:
Am Samstag 18 August 2007 22:51:20 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
On Samstag, 18. August 2007, Mick wrote:
Which of the two is it suitable for a desktop?
SLAB
slub is
Selon Volker Armin Hemmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Samstag, 18. August 2007, Mick wrote:
Which of the two is it suitable for a desktop?
SLAB
slub is still very experimental, not well tested and extremly buggy.
Don't use slub except on test systems.
I've been using slub since kernel 2.6.22
On Sunday 19 August 2007 01:32:27 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Selon Volker Armin Hemmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Samstag, 18. August 2007, Mick wrote:
Which of the two is it suitable for a desktop?
SLAB
slub is still very experimental, not well tested and extremly buggy.
Don't use
Which of the two is it suitable for a desktop?
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Am Samstag 18 August 2007 19:38:01 schrieb Mick:
Which of the two is it suitable for a desktop?
Both should work fine. As far as I can remember SLUB was created because of
SLAB's huge overhead on clusters with more than 100 processors.
SLAB is well tested. SLUB is less complex and might give
On Samstag, 18. August 2007, Mick wrote:
Which of the two is it suitable for a desktop?
SLAB
slub is still very experimental, not well tested and extremly buggy.
Don't use slub except on test systems.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Saturday 18 August 2007 04:51:20 pm Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Samstag, 18. August 2007, Mick wrote:
Which of the two is it suitable for a desktop?
SLAB
slub is still very experimental, not well tested and extremly buggy.
Don't use slub except on test systems.
That said, slub is
Am Samstag 18 August 2007 22:51:20 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
On Samstag, 18. August 2007, Mick wrote:
Which of the two is it suitable for a desktop?
SLAB
slub is still very experimental, not well tested and extremly buggy.
Don't use slub except on test systems.
I wouldn't recommend
On Samstag, 18. August 2007, Florian Philipp wrote:
Am Samstag 18 August 2007 22:51:20 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
On Samstag, 18. August 2007, Mick wrote:
Which of the two is it suitable for a desktop?
SLAB
slub is still very experimental, not well tested and extremly buggy.
13 matches
Mail list logo
