Wols Lists wrote:
> On 07/12/20 04:24, Dale wrote:
>> I visited with my friend who recently got the same type of internet I'll
>> be getting. Odds are, the boxes will be the same. She has hers through
>> a power company and that's what I'm getting, just a different power
>> company. Anyway, as
On 07/12/20 04:24, Dale wrote:
> I visited with my friend who recently got the same type of internet I'll
> be getting. Odds are, the boxes will be the same. She has hers through
> a power company and that's what I'm getting, just a different power
> company. Anyway, as I suspected, it has a
antlists wrote:
> On 04/12/2020 01:40, Dale wrote:
>> Also, our local power company is about to start rolling out internet
>> service. It's done with fiber and the slowest package, 200MBs/sec, is
>> over 100 times faster than my current DSL. It only costs $4.00 a month
>> more than what I'm
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 12/4/20 12:02 PM, Dale wrote:
>>
>> So basically, that package would have to start over from scratch to be
>> fixed. That's not very likely if history means anything.
>>
>
> I think the opentmpfiles devs are planning to copy/paste the
> systemd-tmpfiles C code into
On 12/4/20 12:02 PM, Dale wrote:
So basically, that package would have to start over from scratch to be
fixed. That's not very likely if history means anything.
I think the opentmpfiles devs are planning to copy/paste the
systemd-tmpfiles C code into opentmpfiles eventually. That will make
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 12/4/20 1:44 AM, Dale wrote:
>>
>> Will opentmpfiles be fixed at some point or is it true that it can't be
>> fixed? On -dev, I think I read where one person said it can't be
>> fixed. In that case, switching is likely a good idea since the insecure
>> package can't
On 12/4/20 1:44 AM, Dale wrote:
Will opentmpfiles be fixed at some point or is it true that it can't be
fixed? On -dev, I think I read where one person said it can't be
fixed. In that case, switching is likely a good idea since the insecure
package can't be fixed.
The answer is a bit
On 12/4/20 5:47 AM, Michael wrote:
If sys-apps/opentmpfiles is installed on openrc profiles, will this be
depracated and replaced with sys-apps/systemd-tmpfiles, or is this something
we should do manually ourselves?
Only the default is being changed for now, so you should swap them yourself.
On 12/4/20 3:55 AM, tastytea wrote:
From what I could gather, opentmpfiles is only vulnerable when an
attacker is able to put a config file into /etc/tmpfiles.d/, so they
have to be already root.
The exploit does require an entry in /etc/tmpfiles.d, but many packages
install perfectly
On Friday, 4 December 2020 02:18:49 GMT Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 12/3/20 8:40 PM, Dale wrote:
> > Howdy,
> >
> > I've mentioned I follow -dev to see what is coming around the corner.
> > There is a thread on there about switching tmpfiles packages for
> > security reasons. I currently have
On Friday, 4 December 2020 09:09:36 GMT antlists wrote:
> On 04/12/2020 01:40, Dale wrote:
> > Also, our local power company is about to start rolling out internet
> > service. It's done with fiber and the slowest package, 200MBs/sec, is
> > over 100 times faster than my current DSL. It only
antlists wrote:
> On 04/12/2020 01:40, Dale wrote:
>> Also, our local power company is about to start rolling out internet
>> service. It's done with fiber and the slowest package, 200MBs/sec, is
>> over 100 times faster than my current DSL. It only costs $4.00 a month
>> more than what I'm
On 04/12/2020 01:40, Dale wrote:
Also, our local power company is about to start rolling out internet
service. It's done with fiber and the slowest package, 200MBs/sec, is
over 100 times faster than my current DSL. It only costs $4.00 a month
more than what I'm paying now. Their fastest
On 2020-12-03 19:40-0600 Dale wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I've mentioned I follow -dev to see what is coming around the corner.
> There is a thread on there about switching tmpfiles packages for
> security reasons. I currently have sys-apps/opentmpfiles installed.
> I guess that is the default for
Kusoneko wrote:
> On December 4, 2020 1:40:57 AM UTC, Dale wrote:
>
> Highly doubt OS matters at all for ISPs. Internet service is standardized you
> could say, at least at the end points where a device connects to a home
> network or to the ISP, so there's no reason why a Linux-based OS
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 12/3/20 8:40 PM, Dale wrote:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> I've mentioned I follow -dev to see what is coming around the corner.
>> There is a thread on there about switching tmpfiles packages for
>> security reasons. I currently have sys-apps/opentmpfiles installed. I
>> guess
On 12/3/20 9:18 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
There's a full explanation here:
http://michael.orlitzky.com/cves/cve-2017-18925.xhtml
Just kidding, there were actually two:
http://michael.orlitzky.com/cves/cve-2017-18188.xhtml
On 12/3/20 8:40 PM, Dale wrote:
Howdy,
I've mentioned I follow -dev to see what is coming around the corner.
There is a thread on there about switching tmpfiles packages for
security reasons. I currently have sys-apps/opentmpfiles installed. I
guess that is the default for openrc. Someone
On December 4, 2020 1:40:57 AM UTC, Dale wrote:
>Howdy,
>
>I've mentioned I follow -dev to see what is coming around the corner.
>There is a thread on there about switching tmpfiles packages for
>security reasons. I currently have sys-apps/opentmpfiles installed. I
>guess that is the default
Howdy,
I've mentioned I follow -dev to see what is coming around the corner.
There is a thread on there about switching tmpfiles packages for
security reasons. I currently have sys-apps/opentmpfiles installed. I
guess that is the default for openrc. Someone mentioned
systemd-tmpfiles as a
20 matches
Mail list logo
