Re: [gentoo-user] The LIGHTEST web server (just for serving files)?

2011-11-14 Thread J. Roeleveld
On Sat, November 12, 2011 2:11 pm, YoYo Siska wrote: On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 07:40:08PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote: During my drive home, something hit my brain: why not have the 'master' server share the distfiles dir via NFS? So, the question now becomes: what's the drawback/benefit of

Re: [gentoo-user] The LIGHTEST web server (just for serving files)?

2011-11-14 Thread microcai
http://code.google.com/p/bashttpd/ run with systemd or xinetd 于 2011年11月14日 18:05, J. Roeleveld 写道: On Sat, November 12, 2011 2:11 pm, YoYo Siska wrote: On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 07:40:08PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote: During my drive home, something hit my brain: why not have the 'master'

Re: [gentoo-user] The LIGHTEST web server (just for serving files)?

2011-11-14 Thread Michael Mol
Isn't there a kernelland HTTP server? ISTR seeing the option. I don't know anything about it, though. On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:10 AM, microcai micro...@fedoraproject.org wrote: http://code.google.com/p/bashttpd/ run with systemd or xinetd 于 2011年11月14日 18:05, J. Roeleveld 写道: On Sat,

Re: [gentoo-user] The LIGHTEST web server (just for serving files)?

2011-11-14 Thread v_2e
There is a very small web server called thttpd which is very lightweight and lets start serving files very quickly. It runs on my home router machine with an old Pentium CPU and several megabytes of RAM and seems to consume about 500 kb of it. Regards, Vladimir On Mon, 14 Nov 2011

[gentoo-user] The LIGHTEST web server (just for serving files) ?

2011-11-12 Thread Pandu Poluan
What is the *LIGHTEST* web server package you know for gentoo? I just want to serve the distfiles, so no CGI / PHP / whathaveyouscripting support is needed. Preferably, with logging so I can see which packages I missed, but not necessary. Rgds, -- FdS Pandu E Poluan ~ IT Optimizer ~  • LOPSA

Re: [gentoo-user] The LIGHTEST web server (just for serving files) ?

2011-11-12 Thread Nilesh Govindarajan
On Sat 12 Nov 2011 01:54:10 PM IST, Pandu Poluan wrote: What is the *LIGHTEST* web server package you know for gentoo? I just want to serve the distfiles, so no CGI / PHP / whathaveyouscripting support is needed. Preferably, with logging so I can see which packages I missed, but not

Re: [gentoo-user] The LIGHTEST web server (just for serving files) ?

2011-11-12 Thread Pandu Poluan
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 15:46, Nilesh Govindarajan cont...@nileshgr.com wrote: On Sat 12 Nov 2011 01:54:10 PM IST, Pandu Poluan wrote: What is the *LIGHTEST* web server package you know for gentoo? I just want to serve the distfiles, so no CGI / PHP / whathaveyouscripting support is needed.

Re: [gentoo-user] The LIGHTEST web server (just for serving files) ?

2011-11-12 Thread Florian Philipp
Am 12.11.2011 10:01, schrieb Pandu Poluan: On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 15:46, Nilesh Govindarajan cont...@nileshgr.com wrote: On Sat 12 Nov 2011 01:54:10 PM IST, Pandu Poluan wrote: What is the *LIGHTEST* web server package you know for gentoo? I just want to serve the distfiles, so no CGI /

Re: [gentoo-user] The LIGHTEST web server (just for serving files)?

2011-11-12 Thread Mick
On Saturday 12 Nov 2011 09:14:27 Florian Philipp wrote: Am 12.11.2011 10:01, schrieb Pandu Poluan: On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 15:46, Nilesh Govindarajan cont...@nileshgr.com wrote: On Sat 12 Nov 2011 01:54:10 PM IST, Pandu Poluan wrote: What is the *LIGHTEST* web server package you know for

Re: [gentoo-user] The LIGHTEST web server (just for serving files)?

2011-11-12 Thread Pandu Poluan
On Nov 12, 2011 7:00 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: I've been using boa just for this purpose for years: * www-servers/boa Available versions: ~ 0.94.14_rc21 ~x86 ~sparc ~mips ~ppc ~amd64 [doc] Homepage:http://www.boa.org/

Re: [gentoo-user] The LIGHTEST web server (just for serving files)?

2011-11-12 Thread Mick
On Saturday 12 Nov 2011 12:40:08 Pandu Poluan wrote: On Nov 12, 2011 7:00 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: I've been using boa just for this purpose for years: * www-servers/boa Available versions: ~ 0.94.14_rc21 ~x86 ~sparc ~mips ~ppc ~amd64 [doc]

Re: [gentoo-user] The LIGHTEST web server (just for serving files)?

2011-11-12 Thread YoYo Siska
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 07:40:08PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote: On Nov 12, 2011 7:00 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: I've been using boa just for this purpose for years: * www-servers/boa Available versions: ~ 0.94.14_rc21 ~x86 ~sparc ~mips ~ppc ~amd64

Re: [gentoo-user] The LIGHTEST web server (just for serving files)?

2011-11-12 Thread Stéphane Guedon
On Saturday 12 November 2011 14:01:54 Mick wrote: On Saturday 12 Nov 2011 12:40:08 Pandu Poluan wrote: On Nov 12, 2011 7:00 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: I've been using boa just for this purpose for years: * www-servers/boa Available versions:

Re: [gentoo-user] The LIGHTEST web server (just for serving files)?

2011-11-12 Thread Florian Philipp
Am 12.11.2011 13:40, schrieb Pandu Poluan: During my drive home, something hit my brain: why not have the 'master' server share the distfiles dir via NFS? So, the question now becomes: what's the drawback/benefit of NFS-sharing vs HTTP-sharing? The scenario is back-end LAN at the office,

Re: [gentoo-user] The LIGHTEST web server (just for serving files)?

2011-11-12 Thread Pandu Poluan
On Nov 12, 2011 8:05 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: On Saturday 12 Nov 2011 12:40:08 Pandu Poluan wrote: On Nov 12, 2011 7:00 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: I've been using boa just for this purpose for years: * www-servers/boa Available versions:

Re: [gentoo-user] The LIGHTEST web server (just for serving files)?

2011-11-12 Thread Pandu Poluan
On Nov 12, 2011 8:16 PM, YoYo Siska y...@gl.ksp.sk wrote: On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 07:40:08PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote: On Nov 12, 2011 7:00 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: I've been using boa just for this purpose for years: * www-servers/boa Available versions:

Re: [gentoo-user] The LIGHTEST web server (just for serving files)?

2011-11-12 Thread Pandu Poluan
On Nov 12, 2011 8:20 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote: Am 12.11.2011 13:40, schrieb Pandu Poluan: During my drive home, something hit my brain: why not have the 'master' server share the distfiles dir via NFS? So, the question now becomes: what's the drawback/benefit of

Re: [gentoo-user] The LIGHTEST web server (just for serving files) ?

2011-11-12 Thread Ciprian Dorin Craciun
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:24, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote: What is the *LIGHTEST* web server package you know for gentoo? I just want to serve the distfiles, so no CGI / PHP / whathaveyouscripting support is needed. Preferably, with logging so I can see which packages I missed, but

Re: [gentoo-user] The LIGHTEST web server (just for serving files)?

2011-11-12 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 19:40:08 +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote: During my drive home, something hit my brain: why not have the 'master' server share the distfiles dir via NFS? No reason at all, I've been doing it for years without a single problem. So, the question now becomes: what's the

Re: [gentoo-user] The LIGHTEST web server (just for serving files)?

2011-11-12 Thread William Kenworthy
Its been solved in the past ... designed for just this purpose: moriah ~ # esearch http-replicator [ Results for search key : http-replicator ] [ Applications found : 1 ] * net-proxy/http-replicator Latest version available: 3.0-r2 Latest version installed: 3.0-r2 Size of