Re: [gentoo-user] Trouble with portage

Fernando Antunes wrote: On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 8:03 AM, econti > wrote: AllenJB ha scritto: cut On to your next issue where 2 versions of firefox are being pulled in. First of all you need to remove the package.mask entry you add

Re: [gentoo-user] Trouble with portage

On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 8:03 AM, econti wrote: > AllenJB ha scritto: > > cut > >> On to your next issue where 2 versions of firefox are being pulled in. >> First of all you need to remove the package.mask entry you added, since it >> masked out all versions of firefox above 2.0.0 - that includes

Re: [gentoo-user] Trouble with portage

AllenJB ha scritto: cut On to your next issue where 2 versions of firefox are being pulled in. First of all you need to remove the package.mask entry you added, since it masked out all versions of firefox above 2.0.0 - that includes both firefox 2 and firefox 3 - not particularly useful. The

Re: [gentoo-user] Trouble with portage

AllenJB writes: > First of all, a tip: If a portage upgrade is available, do "emerge > portage" first. New versions of portage often have new or improved > features - in this case portage 2.1.6 includes, among other things, > the ability to automatically handle most blockers. Though even the por

Re: [gentoo-user] Trouble with portage

You have several issues here. First of all, a tip: If a portage upgrade is available, do "emerge portage" first. New versions of portage often have new or improved features - in this case portage 2.1.6 includes, among other things, the ability to automatically handle most blockers. The block

[gentoo-user] Trouble with portage

Hi all, to-day I am having some trouble to update my system. Well, 'emerge --sync' and I received a message telling me a new version of portage is available and I should update it immediately. But, before upgrading it I ran 'emerge -NDpvu world'. Here is the output: >localhost ~ # emerge -NDpv