Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-24 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Thursday 23 October 2008 11:03:12 Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > I thought he already installed some of the qt split ebuilds so they > should be unmasked, but let us see :-) I've found it myself. For some reason I had these two entries in my world file: x11-libs/qt x11-libs/qt:3 Once I'd removed

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-24 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Thursday 23 October 2008 11:03:12 Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > I thought he already installed some of the qt split ebuilds so they > should be unmasked, but let us see :-) $ sudo autounmask x11-libs/qt-4.3.3 autounmask version 0.21 (using PortageXS-0.02.07 and portage-2.2_rc12) * Using reposi

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-23 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
2008/10/23 Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thursday 23 October 2008 11:28:49 Peter Humphrey wrote: >> On Wednesday 22 October 2008 19:32:08 Daniel Pielmeier wrote: >> > Please post again the output from emerge -pvutND world but attach it in >> > a file so it doesn't get crippled by the mail

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-23 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Thursday 23 October 2008 11:28:49 Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Wednesday 22 October 2008 19:32:08 Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > > Please post again the output from emerge -pvutND world but attach it in > > a file so it doesn't get crippled by the mail program. > > Attached. Finally, we can see what y

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-23 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Wednesday 22 October 2008 19:32:08 Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > Please post again the output from emerge -pvutND world but attach it in > a file so it doesn't get crippled by the mail program. Attached. > Also what I have seen from your previous tree output is that you are > trying to do many th

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-22 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
Peter Humphrey schrieb am 22.10.2008 18:42: > Now I'm back on the original system, and putting Alex's package.keywords > entries in I find I still have the blockers; his solution isn't working for > me, even after reinstalling PyQt4 and sip. Neither is my own on this > system. But then I'm getti

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-22 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Wednesday 22 October 2008 12:10:15 Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > 2008/10/22 Alex Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I think I have the same conflict. I just solved it by putting this into > > package.keywords: > > ~dev-python/PyQt4-4.4.3 > > ~dev-python/sip-4.7.7 > > [...] > > This is maybe the PyQt

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-22 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
2008/10/22 Alex Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I think I have the same conflict. I just solved it by putting this into > package.keywords: > ~dev-python/PyQt4-4.4.3 > ~dev-python/sip-4.7.7 > > So I upgraded to PyQt4-4.4.3, and this depends on the splitted Qt ebuilds, > while PyQt4 up to version

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-22 Thread Alex Schuster
Neil Bothwick writes: > On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:15:34 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > That was a good idea, one that I ought to have thought of but didn't. > > Unfortunately, it's made no difference at all. Emerge -upDvN world > > still gives the same block: [...] > > To recap, the only version of

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-22 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 22 October 2008 11:15:34 Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Tuesday 21 October 2008 19:46:33 Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > > One thing I would give a try is to give portage a hand and emerge some of > > the qt split ebuilds with the oneshot option. In your case the qt split > > ebuilds which are b

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-22 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:15:34 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > That was a good idea, one that I ought to have thought of but didn't. > Unfortunately, it's made no difference at all. Emerge -upDvN world > still gives the same block: > > [blocks B ] x11-libs/qt-core ("x11-libs/qt-core" is blockin

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-22 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Tuesday 21 October 2008 19:46:33 Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > One thing I would give a try is to give portage a hand and emerge some of > the qt split ebuilds with the oneshot option. In your case the qt split > ebuilds which are blocked: > > x11-libs/qt-script-4.4.2, x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.4.2, > x1

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-21 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
Peter Humphrey schrieb am 21.10.2008 11:07: > On Monday 20 October 2008 13:08:30 Daniel Pielmeier wrote: >> Unmerge x11-libs/qt-4.3.3 and try again. If you want to be on the safe >> side do a quickpkg =x11-libs/qt-4.3.3 before. The new qt-4.4.x split >> ebuilds can not live alongside the non split

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-21 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Monday 20 October 2008 13:08:30 Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > Unmerge x11-libs/qt-4.3.3 and try again. If you want to be on the safe > side do a quickpkg =x11-libs/qt-4.3.3 before. The new qt-4.4.x split > ebuilds can not live alongside the non split ebuild. I ran quickpkg and emerge -C on qt-4.3.3

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-20 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
Unmerge x11-libs/qt-4.3.3 and try again. If you want to be on the safe side do a quickpkg =x11-libs/qt-4.3.3 before. The new qt-4.4.x split ebuilds can not live alongside the non split ebuild. -- Regards, Daniel

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-20 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Monday 20 October 2008 09:46:56 Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Sunday 19 October 2008 18:52:49 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > I main underlying reason seems to be that Qt now comes as split-ebuilds > > and Peter has some monolithic ones installed. It's similar to migrating > > KDE to split-ebuilds, but on

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-20 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Sunday 19 October 2008 16:28:35 Alan McKinnon wrote: > Repost the output of your emerge command using the "-t" option. > > Tip: tricky blockers often require that you post the output of 'emerge > -t'. Otherwise all we know is THAT you have a block and no way to > determine WHY it's happening. I

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-20 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Sunday 19 October 2008 18:52:49 Alan McKinnon wrote: > I main underlying reason seems to be that Qt now comes as split-ebuilds > and Peter has some monolithic ones installed. It's similar to migrating > KDE to split-ebuilds, but on a much smaller scale. Unfortunately there's > no easy way to au

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Sunday 19 October 2008 19:32:42 Alex Schuster wrote: > Alan McKinnon writes: > > Repost the output of your emerge command using the "-t" option. > > > > Tip: tricky blockers often require that you post the output of 'emerge > > -t'. Otherwise all we know is THAT you have a block and no way to >

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-19 Thread Alex Schuster
Alan McKinnon writes: > Repost the output of your emerge command using the "-t" option. > > Tip: tricky blockers often require that you post the output of 'emerge > -t'. Otherwise all we know is THAT you have a block and no way to > determine WHY it's happening. If you are going to post emerge out

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Sunday 19 October 2008 16:50:37 Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Sunday 19 October 2008 15:24:45 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > From the qt-core-4.4.2 ebuild: > > > > RDEPEND=" > > !<=x11-libs/qt-4.4.0_alpha:${SLOT} > > " > > > > [The] first blocker you have does NOT refer to any version less than > > 4.4.0

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-19 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
Peter Humphrey schrieb am 19.10.2008 16:50: > On Sunday 19 October 2008 15:24:45 Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> From the qt-core-4.4.2 ebuild: >> >> RDEPEND=" >> !<=x11-libs/qt-4.4.0_alpha:${SLOT} >> " >> >> [The] first blocker you have does NOT refer to any version less than >> 4.4.0_alpha, it means a

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-19 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Sunday 19 October 2008 15:24:45 Alan McKinnon wrote: > From the qt-core-4.4.2 ebuild: > > RDEPEND=" > !<=x11-libs/qt-4.4.0_alpha:${SLOT} > " > > [The] first blocker you have does NOT refer to any version less than > 4.4.0_alpha, it means any version less than that which is SLOT=4. I thought th

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Sunday 19 October 2008 15:54:24 Peter Humphrey wrote: > Having been inspired by messages here extolling the virtues of KDE-4, I > tried installing it. I did as Neil B said and autounmasked kde-meta-4.1.2, > but I still have a couple of show-stoppers. > > After running autounmask, I had 81 new en

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-19 Thread Weifeng Liu
I think I had the similar blocks while upgrading my kde from 3.5.x to 4.1.2, I just unmerged x11-libs/qt-core then everything seemed to be fine. -Weifeng On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Peter Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Having been inspired by messages here extolling the virtues of KDE

[gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-19 Thread Peter Humphrey
Having been inspired by messages here extolling the virtues of KDE-4, I tried installing it. I did as Neil B said and autounmasked kde-meta-4.1.2, but I still have a couple of show-stoppers. After running autounmask, I had 81 new entries in package.keywords, but I had to add another 82 myself a