Re: [gentoo-user] What's the deal with CAMERAS anyway?

On 5/4/09, Paul Hartman wrote: > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Arttu V. wrote: >> Anyone got a clue why *not* setting CAMERAS won't build drivers for >> all cameras as claimed several times in the libgphoto2 ebuild? > > src_configure() in the libgphoto2 ebuild looks like it handles the > none=a

Re: [gentoo-user] What's the deal with CAMERAS anyway?

On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Arttu V. wrote: > Hello, > > Inspired by the other digicam thread I took a quick look at an older > problem of mine, namely getting libgphoto2 to compile drivers for all > cameras. > > Anyone got a clue why *not* setting CAMERAS won't build drivers for > all cameras

Re: [gentoo-user] What's the deal with CAMERAS anyway?

I have compiled libgphoto by "./configure, make, make install" way. Us I understand, it does not use settings from make.conf? (If I understand question with my bad English :D) Arttu V. wrote: > Hello, > > Inspired by the other digicam thread I took a quick look at an older > problem of mine, namel

[gentoo-user] What's the deal with CAMERAS anyway?

Hello, Inspired by the other digicam thread I took a quick look at an older problem of mine, namely getting libgphoto2 to compile drivers for all cameras. Anyone got a clue why *not* setting CAMERAS won't build drivers for all cameras as claimed several times in the libgphoto2 ebuild? All I see