On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> You did post emerge output using -t and it shows up at the top level
> which is a bit odd, it implies portage wants to update opencv anyway,
> not as a result of it being a dep.
I agree it's odd and I agree it appears that portage isn't upd
On 29/03/2014 01:48, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
>> You need opencv as it's a dep for something, and portage wants you to
>> have a version that's in the tree. The only stable version is 2.4.5 but
>> you have masked that in package.mask
>
> H
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> You need opencv as it's a dep for something, and portage wants you to
> have a version that's in the tree. The only stable version is 2.4.5 but
> you have masked that in package.mask
Hi Alan,
I attempted to mask only opencv greater than 2.4
On 29/03/2014 01:05, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can anyone tell me why portage is insisting on upgrading me from
> opencv-2.4.5 to opencv-2.4.8?
It's not doing that.
You need opencv as it's a dep for something, and portage wants you to
have a version that's in the tree. The only stable
Hello,
Can anyone tell me why portage is insisting on upgrading me from
opencv-2.4.5 to opencv-2.4.8?
I would not expect portage to want to do this because:
1. opencv-2.4.8 is unstable (and I run a stable system)
2. >opencv-2.4.5 is masked
Thank you,
Chris
=
jane ~ # grep opencv /etc/po
5 matches
Mail list logo
