Re: [gentoo-user] Why portage demands to unmask an unstable version of the package?

2017-03-04 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 4 Mar 2017 09:52:38 -0800, Jorge Almeida wrote: > >> [ebuild U ] app-vim/gentoo-syntax-20170225 [20160530] > >> [ebuild U ~] app-editors/gvim-8.0.0386 [8.0.0106] > > > > Because vim-8.0.0386 is stable and, presumably, the vim and gvim > > versions must match. I would suggest

Re: [gentoo-user] Why portage demands to unmask an unstable version of the package?

2017-03-04 Thread Marc Joliet
On Saturday 04 March 2017 10:40:06 Jorge Almeida wrote: > On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Marc Joliet > > > > Does nobody think of searching bugs.gentoo.org anymore? It was an > > oversight: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611386#c6. > > Actually, most plain users won't

Re: [gentoo-user] Why portage demands to unmask an unstable version of the package?

2017-03-04 Thread Gevisz
On Sat, 4 Mar 2017 16:37:13 + Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 4 Mar 2017 18:21:23 +0200, gevisz wrote: > > > $ eix gvim > > [I] app-editors/gvim > > Available versions: 8.0.0106 ~8.0.0386 ** {acl aqua cscope > > debug gnome gtk gtk3 lua luajit motif neXt

Re: [gentoo-user] Why portage demands to unmask an unstable version of the package?

2017-03-04 Thread Jorge Almeida
On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Marc Joliet > > Does nobody think of searching bugs.gentoo.org anymore? It was an oversight: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611386#c6. > Actually, most plain users won't remember or know that there is such a thing. Your post may

Re: [gentoo-user] Why portage demands to unmask an unstable version of the package?

2017-03-04 Thread Marc Joliet
On Saturday 04 March 2017 09:52:38 Jorge Almeida wrote: > On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > On Sat, 4 Mar 2017 18:21:23 +0200, gevisz wrote: > >> So, in my portage tree currently there is one stable gvim package with > >> version 8.0.0106 > >> and one

Re: [gentoo-user] Why portage demands to unmask an unstable version of the package?

2017-03-04 Thread Jorge Almeida
On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 4 Mar 2017 18:21:23 +0200, gevisz wrote: > >> So, in my portage tree currently there is one stable gvim package with >> version 8.0.0106 >> and one unstable gvim package, with version 8.0.0386. >> >> Why portage

Re: [gentoo-user] Why portage demands to unmask an unstable version of the package?

2017-03-04 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 4 Mar 2017 18:21:23 +0200, gevisz wrote: > $ eix gvim > [I] app-editors/gvim > Available versions: 8.0.0106 ~8.0.0386 ** {acl aqua cscope > debug gnome gtk gtk3 lua luajit motif neXt netbeans nls perl python > racket ruby selinux session tcl PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_4 >

[gentoo-user] Why portage demands to unmask an unstable version of the package?

2017-03-04 Thread gevisz
$ eix gvim [I] app-editors/gvim Available versions: 8.0.0106 ~8.0.0386 ** {acl aqua cscope debug gnome gtk gtk3 lua luajit motif neXt netbeans nls perl python racket ruby selinux session tcl PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_4 python3_5 python3_6"} Installed versions: