Apparently, though unproven, at 01:18 on Thursday 09 September 2010, dhk did
opine thusly:
Well I deleted /usr/lib32/qt4/libQtOpenGL.so.4.6.2 and ran
revdep-rebuild and got the following
. . .
* Checking dynamic linking consistency
[ 39% ] * broken
On 09/09/2010 04:59 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 01:18 on Thursday 09 September 2010, dhk did
opine thusly:
Well I deleted /usr/lib32/qt4/libQtOpenGL.so.4.6.2 and ran
revdep-rebuild and got the following
. . .
* Checking dynamic linking consistency
[ 39% ] *
Apparently, though unproven, at 15:08 on Thursday 09 September 2010, dhk did
opine thusly:
On 09/09/2010 04:59 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 01:18 on Thursday 09 September 2010, dhk
did
opine thusly:
Well I deleted /usr/lib32/qt4/libQtOpenGL.so.4.6.2 and
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:08:07 -0400, dhk wrote:
How do I use SEARCH_DIRS_MASK, is there a doc? I didn't see anything
under man make.conf. I don't think I want to exclude the whole
directory, just the library: right?
If you only want to exclude a library, you need LD_LIBRARY_MASK.
The
Below is the output when I run revdep-rebuild --ignore. This started
in the spring and never cleared up. Everything on my amd64 box runs
fine and nothing complains about the missing library. I regularly do
updates and everytime I run revdep-rebuild --ignore I get the same
results. How can I
Apparently, though unproven, at 15:11 on Wednesday 08 September 2010, dhk did
opine thusly:
Below is the output when I run revdep-rebuild --ignore. This started
in the spring and never cleared up. Everything on my amd64 box runs
fine and nothing complains about the missing library. I
On 09/08/2010 09:36 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 15:11 on Wednesday 08 September 2010, dhk did
opine thusly:
Below is the output when I run revdep-rebuild --ignore. This started
in the spring and never cleared up. Everything on my amd64 box runs
fine and
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:19 on Wednesday 08 September 2010, dhk did
opine thusly:
On 09/08/2010 09:36 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 15:11 on Wednesday 08 September 2010, dhk
did
opine thusly:
Below is the output when I run revdep-rebuild --ignore.
On 09/08/2010 05:47 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:19 on Wednesday 08 September 2010, dhk did
opine thusly:
On 09/08/2010 09:36 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 15:11 on Wednesday 08 September 2010, dhk
did
opine thusly:
Below is the
9 matches
Mail list logo