Re: [gentoo-user] creating overlay to modify net-fs/samba-3.6.18

2013-09-14 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 14/09/2013 11:26, Mick wrote: > On Thursday 12 Sep 2013 01:28:00 Timur Aydin wrote: >> On 09/12/13 01:00, Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> Yes of course, it make a great deal of sense now. Basically, your local >>> overlay had no idea where the parent portage tree is or how to find it >>> so couldn't fi

Re: [gentoo-user] creating overlay to modify net-fs/samba-3.6.18

2013-09-14 Thread Mick
On Thursday 12 Sep 2013 01:28:00 Timur Aydin wrote: > On 09/12/13 01:00, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Yes of course, it make a great deal of sense now. Basically, your local > > overlay had no idea where the parent portage tree is or how to find it > > so couldn't find the eclass directory. > > > > As

Re: [gentoo-user] creating overlay to modify net-fs/samba-3.6.18

2013-09-11 Thread Timur Aydin
On 09/12/13 01:00, Alan McKinnon wrote: > Yes of course, it make a great deal of sense now. Basically, your local > overlay had no idea where the parent portage tree is or how to find it > so couldn't find the eclass directory. > > As I understand it, this information used to be hard-coded magic a

Re: [gentoo-user] creating overlay to modify net-fs/samba-3.6.18

2013-09-11 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 11/09/2013 22:46, Timur Aydin wrote: > On 09/11/13 23:13, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> I can't reproduce that fault here, and google hits on the matter seem to >> point towards stale metadata referencing eclasses that no longer exist. >> I have a hunch you do not have valid metadata for your local ov

Re: [gentoo-user] creating overlay to modify net-fs/samba-3.6.18

2013-09-11 Thread Timur Aydin
On 09/11/13 23:13, Alan McKinnon wrote: > I can't reproduce that fault here, and google hits on the matter seem to > point towards stale metadata referencing eclasses that no longer exist. > I have a hunch you do not have valid metadata for your local overlay, so > I suggest: > > 1. delete the ecl

Re: [gentoo-user] creating overlay to modify net-fs/samba-3.6.18

2013-09-11 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 11/09/2013 00:22, Timur Aydin wrote: > On 09/11/13 00:01, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> I suspect your make.conf is faulty. >> >> What is the contents of make.conf? >> what is ls -al $PORTDIR/eclass/pam.eclass >> > > Here are the contents of /etc/portage/make.conf: > > =

Re: [gentoo-user] creating overlay to modify net-fs/samba-3.6.18

2013-09-10 Thread Timur Aydin
On 09/11/13 00:01, Alan McKinnon wrote: > Do you have userpriv set in FEATURES? > > That makes emerge run as portage which cannot read /root. Here is the value of FEATURES, based on the output of emerge --info: FEATURES="assume-digests binpkg-logs config-protect-if-modified distlocks ebuild-lock

Re: [gentoo-user] creating overlay to modify net-fs/samba-3.6.18

2013-09-10 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 10/09/2013 22:11, Timur Aydin wrote: > Today I had quite a bit of issues while creating a local overlay to > modify samba. Got through all of them, but there were the following > issues which I wanted to bring up, because I am not sure whether I have > done anything wrong: > > - I had created t

[gentoo-user] creating overlay to modify net-fs/samba-3.6.18

2013-09-10 Thread Timur Aydin
Today I had quite a bit of issues while creating a local overlay to modify samba. Got through all of them, but there were the following issues which I wanted to bring up, because I am not sure whether I have done anything wrong: - I had created the overlay under "/root/overlay", but this is causin