On Mon, 01 Aug 2016 16:49:15 +0100, Mick wrote:
> Thank you Peter, I seem to have posted a few seconds before I received
> your message. From what you're showing above I seem to have not
> performed a correct mount of the chroot fs. I better rinse and
> repeat ...
If you are using systemd, it i
On Monday 01 Aug 2016 17:21:52 Mick wrote:
> On Monday 01 Aug 2016 16:49:15 Mick wrote:
> > Thank you Peter, I seem to have posted a few seconds before I received
> > your message. From what you're showing above I seem to have not
> > performed a correct mount of the chroot fs. I better rinse and
On Monday 01 Aug 2016 16:49:15 Mick wrote:
> Thank you Peter, I seem to have posted a few seconds before I received your
> message. From what you're showing above I seem to have not performed a
> correct mount of the chroot fs. I better rinse and repeat ...
Hmm ... I followed the handbook this
On Monday 01 Aug 2016 16:31:18 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Monday 01 Aug 2016 14:51:02 Mick wrote:
> > Given Andrew's steer I had another look and found this guide:
> >
> > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:AMD64/32-bit_Chroot_Guide
> >
> > Is this approach still valid, or have things moved on
On Monday 01 Aug 2016 14:51:02 Mick wrote:
> Given Andrew's steer I had another look and found this guide:
>
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:AMD64/32-bit_Chroot_Guide
>
> Is this approach still valid, or have things moved on since this article
> was authored (2012) and different configura
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 07:40:37PM +0100, Mick wrote
> Hi All,
>
> I am dipping my toe into cross-compile territory, in order to build i686
> binaries for a 32bit box, which is too old to do its own emerges. I am using
> an amd64 box which is significantly faster to do all the heavy lifting and
On Sunday 31 Jul 2016 23:31:29 you wrote:
> On Sunday 31 Jul 2016 23:18:00 Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> > On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 19:40:37 +0100 Mick wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I am dipping my toe into cross-compile territory, in order to build i686
> > > binaries for a 32bit box, which is too old
On Sunday 31 Jul 2016 23:18:00 Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 19:40:37 +0100 Mick wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am dipping my toe into cross-compile territory, in order to build i686
> > binaries for a 32bit box, which is too old to do its own emerges. I am
> > using an amd64 box wh
On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 19:40:37 +0100 Mick wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am dipping my toe into cross-compile territory, in order to build i686
> binaries for a 32bit box, which is too old to do its own emerges. I am using
> an amd64 box which is significantly faster to do all the heavy lifting and
> st
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 07:40:37PM +0100, Mick wrote:
>
> * ARCH is not set... Are you missing the '/usr/i686-pc-linux-
> * gnu/etc/portage/make.profile' symlink? Is the symlink correct? Is your
> * portage tree complete?
> ===
>
> As far as I can tell the link is there:
>
> # ls
On 07/31/2016 01:40 PM, Mick wrote:
Hi All,
I am dipping my toe into cross-compile territory, in order to build i686
binaries for a 32bit box, which is too old to do its own emerges.
An excellent idea. As one who has performed the upgrade/downgrade
surgery on many systems; the single biggest
Hi All,
I am dipping my toe into cross-compile territory, in order to build i686
binaries for a 32bit box, which is too old to do its own emerges. I am using
an amd64 box which is significantly faster to do all the heavy lifting and
started applying this page:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Emb
12 matches
Mail list logo
