Hi,
again, portage's dependencies caculation makes me wonder.
This time,
emerge --update --newuse --deep @system @world
tells me quite a few dependencies like
* ~x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.1 pulled in by:
* x11-libs/qt-4.5.1
I do have x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.2 and x11-libs/qt-4.5.2 installed.
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
again, portage's dependencies caculation makes me wonder.
This time,
emerge --update --newuse --deep @system @world
tells me quite a few dependencies like
* ~x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.1 pulled in by:
* x11-libs/qt-4.5.1
I do have x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.2
Le Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:35:37 +0200 (CEST),
Helmut Jarausch a écrit :
How can I find out which package is pulling x11-libs/qt-4.5.1 in ?
# emerge gentoolkit
# equery d qt
emerge --unmerge =x11-libs/qt-4.5.1
The meta package is no longer used.
HTH,
Roy
On Aug 26, 2009, at 4:35 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
again, portage's dependencies caculation makes me wonder.
This time,
emerge --update --newuse --deep @system @world
tells me quite a few dependencies
On 26 Aug, Fabrice Delliaux wrote:
Le Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:35:37 +0200 (CEST),
Helmut Jarausch a écrit :
How can I find out which package is pulling x11-libs/qt-4.5.1 in ?
# emerge gentoolkit
# equery d qt
Thanks, this shows all packages which depend on qt:4.5 (e.g.)
Since I have qt-4.5.2
On 26 Aug, Roy Wright wrote:
emerge --unmerge =x11-libs/qt-4.5.1
The meta package is no longer used.
But how it comes that
emerge --depclean -p
tells me
* Dependencies could not be completely resolved due to
* the following required packages not being installed:
*
*
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 11:35:37 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
again, portage's dependencies caculation makes me wonder.
This time,
emerge --update --newuse --deep @system @world
tells me quite a few dependencies like
* ~x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.1 pulled in by:
* x11-libs/qt-4.5.1
On 26 Aug, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 11:35:37 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
again, portage's dependencies caculation makes me wonder.
This time,
emerge --update --newuse --deep @system @world
tells me quite a few dependencies like
* ~x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.1 pulled
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 26 Aug, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 11:35:37 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
again, portage's dependencies caculation makes me wonder.
This time,
emerge --update --newuse --deep @system @world
tells me quite a few dependencies like
*
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 12:06:44 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 26 Aug, Roy Wright wrote:
emerge --unmerge =x11-libs/qt-4.5.1
The meta package is no longer used.
But how it comes that
emerge --depclean -p
tells me
* Dependencies could not be completely resolved due to
* the
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 12:10:15 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 26 Aug, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 11:35:37 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
again, portage's dependencies caculation makes me wonder.
This time,
emerge --update --newuse --deep @system @world
tells
On 26 Aug, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 12:10:15 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 26 Aug, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 11:35:37 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
again, portage's dependencies caculation makes me wonder.
This time,
emerge --update --newuse
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 12:30:40 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 26 Aug, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 12:10:15 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 26 Aug, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 11:35:37 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
again, portage's dependencies
I'm sorry but I have never used @system and @world. What is the difference and
why the new syntax. I will surely rtfm.
-- Sent from my Palm Prē
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 12:30:40 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 26 Aug, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 26 August 2009
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 13:38:59 Richard Marzan wrote:
I'm sorry but I have never used @system and @world. What is the difference
and why the new syntax. I will surely rtfm.
It's the new set syntax, available in recent 2.2 portages. I believe there is
some support in recent 2.1 as well
Thanks. That clears things up for me.
-- Sent from my Palm Prē
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 13:38:59 Richard Marzan wrote:
I'm sorry but I have never used @system and @world. What is the difference
and why the new syntax. I will surely rtfm.
It's the new set syntax,
16 matches
Mail list logo