On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 09:28:05PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 08:29:59 -0600, Bruce Hill wrote:
>
> > I can't understand the *need* for the new slot/subslot philosophy.
>
> The need to it is clear. Previous methods worked by breaking things and
> then fixing them, hopefully
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 08:29:59 -0600, Bruce Hill wrote:
> I can't understand the *need* for the new slot/subslot philosophy.
The need to it is clear. Previous methods worked by breaking things and
then fixing them, hopefully before the breakage became a problem,
whenever library APIs changed. Subslo
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 07:29:28AM -0600, Bruce Hill wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 01:04:52PM +0100, hasufell wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Another round of questioning the users here.
> >
> > more specifically:
> > * how often do you experience useless r
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 01:04:52PM +0100, hasufell wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Another round of questioning the users here.
>
> more specifically:
> * how often do you experience useless rebuilds?
> * do you really have a problem with running
> revdep-rebuild/hask
On Sat, 02 Nov 2013 13:04:52 +0100, hasufell wrote:
> * how often do you experience useless rebuilds?
That's an unreasonable question. How do we know whether a rebuild was
useless or not unless we skip it and then find that a single feature of a
complex program no longer works properly, and to do
On 11/02/2013 12:04 PM, hasufell wrote:
> Another round of questioning the users here.
>
> more specifically:
> * how often do you experience useless rebuilds?
not enough to notice, mostly using server based installs not desktop
> * do you really have a problem with running
> revdep-rebuild/haskell
Am 02.11.2013 13:04, schrieb hasufell:
> Another round of questioning the users here.
>
> more specifically:
> * how often do you experience useless rebuilds?
once every couple of updates?
> * do you really have a problem with running
> revdep-rebuild/haskell-updater/perl-cleaner etc after every
On 11/02/2013 05:04 AM, hasufell wrote:
> Another round of questioning the users here.
>
> more specifically:
> * how often do you experience useless rebuilds?
A few times a year. To put this in perspective, I try to do major
updates (-uDN world) once a month. I used to do this weekly but can't
n
On 11/2/2013 07:04, hasufell wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Another round of questioning the users here.
These are good, thank you. Short answer here is no.
more specifically:
* how often do you experience useless rebuilds?
At least one of my machines is constantly want
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/02/2013 07:04 AM, hasufell wrote:
> Another round of questioning the users here.
>
> more specifically: * how often do you experience useless rebuilds?
> * do you really have a problem with running
> revdep-rebuild/haskell-updater/perl-cleaner
On 02/11/2013 14:04, hasufell wrote:
> Another round of questioning the users here.
>
> more specifically:
> * how often do you experience useless rebuilds?
Let's see, that depends.
It mostly mostly on what is happening with poppler and icu today.
Other than those, I don't recall any long-term
131102 hasufell had some more questions for users :
> * how often do you experience useless rebuilds?
Not recently : it used to happen more often.
> * do you really have a problem with running
> revdep-rebuild/haskell-updater/perl-cleaner etc after every emerge?
No.
> * do you think it's worth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Another round of questioning the users here.
more specifically:
* how often do you experience useless rebuilds?
* do you really have a problem with running
revdep-rebuild/haskell-updater/perl-cleaner etc after every emerge?
* do you think it's worth t
13 matches
Mail list logo
