The testign version is better, but sort of strange. For
gentoo-sources it gave a nice readable list. However for rt-sources it
didn't.
rt-sources is from some overlay, and probably you are using
OVERLAY_CACHE_METHOD=none
which cannot read SLOT-data calculated in eclasses.
You might
Hi,
I've been meaning to ask - what's with the new double name thing in eix?
Why is a package now shown as
~2.6.19-r1:2.6.19-r1
instead of just
~2.6.19-r1
How does this help me, or what isit trying to accomplish? As a user
type it sure seems less readable now.
Thanks,
Mark
lightning ~
Mark Knecht wrote:
Why is a package now shown as
~2.6.19-r1:2.6.19-r1
instead of just
~2.6.19-r1
It's showing you the SLOT the package is in. *-sources have the version
as slot, allowing you to install them in parallel, so in that case it's
not very informative. Try eix -e qt, there it
On 12/8/06, Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've been meaning to ask - what's with the new double name thing in eix?
Why is a package now shown as
~2.6.19-r1:2.6.19-r1
instead of just
~2.6.19-r1
How does this help me, or what isit trying to accomplish? As a user
type it sure
On Friday 08 December 2006 17:21, Mark Knecht wrote:
Hi,
I've been meaning to ask - what's with the new double name thing
in eix?
Why is a package now shown as
~2.6.19-r1:2.6.19-r1
instead of just
~2.6.19-r1
The second one is the SLOT for that package. Run eix on an unslotted
On 12/8/06, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 08 December 2006 17:21, Mark Knecht wrote:
Hi,
I've been meaning to ask - what's with the new double name thing
in eix?
Why is a package now shown as
~2.6.19-r1:2.6.19-r1
instead of just
~2.6.19-r1
The second one is the
Thanks all for answering. Now it's much clearer why this is happening.
Alan - do you use some sort of extra config for eix? Your output is
far more readable.
Thanks,
Mark
On 12/8/06, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 08 December 2006 17:21, Mark Knecht wrote:
Hi,
I've been
On Friday 08 December 2006 18:20, Mark Knecht wrote:
Thanks all for answering. Now it's much clearer why this is
happening.
Alan - do you use some sort of extra config for eix? Your output is
far more readable.
Nope, it's a default setup, but probaly an outdated default (see other
mail).
On 12/8/06, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 08 December 2006 18:20, Mark Knecht wrote:
Thanks all for answering. Now it's much clearer why this is
happening.
Alan - do you use some sort of extra config for eix? Your output is
far more readable.
Nope, it's a default setup,
On Friday 08 December 2006 19:16, Mark Knecht wrote:
On 12/8/06, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 08 December 2006 18:20, Mark Knecht wrote:
Thanks all for answering. Now it's much clearer why this is
happening.
Alan - do you use some sort of extra config for eix?
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 09:16:56 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
I re-emerged eix and it doesn't install eixrc at all. If you wouldn't
mind please do send it along off list. I'd like to look through it.
Which version of eix are you using? The output has changed a lot between
0.6.4 (the latest stable) and
On 12/8/06, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 09:16:56 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
I re-emerged eix and it doesn't install eixrc at all. If you wouldn't
mind please do send it along off list. I'd like to look through it.
Which version of eix are you using? The output
On 12/8/06, Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/8/06, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 09:16:56 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
I re-emerged eix and it doesn't install eixrc at all. If you wouldn't
mind please do send it along off list. I'd like to look through
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 11:30:51 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
The testign version is better, but sort of strange. For
gentoo-sources it gave a nice readable list. However for rt-sources it
didn't.
Any reason for wanting them to look different or is this a bug that
should be reported to
On 12/8/06, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 11:30:51 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
The testign version is better, but sort of strange. For
gentoo-sources it gave a nice readable list. However for rt-sources it
didn't.
Any reason for wanting them to look
15 matches
Mail list logo
