Alan McKinnon skrev:
On Saturday 14 November 2009 01:13:06 Neil Bothwick wrote:
However, it did get to the point where it was complaining about two
packages and the number of files to be rebuilt went (IIRC) 52, 50, 50,
so I decide since it was rebuilding 50 packages the 2nd 3rd times it
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:06:02 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
I think it is being over-cautious, which results in packages being
rebuilt multiple time unnecessarily, but I's rather give it the
chance to fix itself. That said, I've never had a list anything like
50 packages long, but I do update
On Saturday 14 November 2009 01:13:06 Neil Bothwick wrote:
However, it did get to the point where it was complaining about two
packages and the number of files to be rebuilt went (IIRC) 52, 50, 50,
so I decide since it was rebuilding 50 packages the 2nd 3rd times it
wasn't going to
On Saturday 14 November 2009 03:06:02 Mark Knecht wrote:
It wasn't that I had 50 packages in the emerge -DuN @world. That was
something like 10. It was after that finished and I ran
@preserved-rebuild that it said 50 packages were effected by something
it found, but those 50 were all dependent
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:58:15 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Almost invariably it's an automagic dependency where the offending
package is not in DEPEND. If you have been through the cycle at least
once, it is safe to delete /var/lib/portage/preserved_libs_registry and
continue on your way.
On Friday 13 November 2009 14:39:52 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:58:15 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Almost invariably it's an automagic dependency where the offending
package is not in DEPEND. If you have been through the cycle at least
once, it is safe to delete
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday 13 November 2009 14:39:52 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:58:15 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Almost invariably it's an automagic dependency where the offending
package is not in DEPEND. If you
On Friday 13 November 2009 21:46:04 Mark Knecht wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Friday 13 November 2009 14:39:52 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:58:15 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Almost invariably it's an automagic
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday 13 November 2009 21:46:04 Mark Knecht wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Friday 13 November 2009 14:39:52 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:19:26 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
I agree that we want to be in agreement but then what are our options
if emerge @preserved-rebuild goes into an endless loop as it seems it
was doing yesterday?
Was it an endless loop? AIUI you emerged twice and the @preserved-rebuild
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:19:26 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
I agree that we want to be in agreement but then what are our options
if emerge @preserved-rebuild goes into an endless loop as it seems it
was doing yesterday?
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:00:33 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
Was it an endless loop? AIUI you emerged twice and the
@preserved-rebuild count decreased. In my experience, it can
occasionally take a few runs to clear the list, sometimes subsequent
runs add packages that were not there
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:00:33 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
Was it an endless loop? AIUI you emerged twice and the
@preserved-rebuild count decreased. In my experience, it can
occasionally take a few runs to clear the list, sometimes subsequent
runs add packages that were
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:00:33 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
Was it an endless loop? AIUI you emerged twice and the
@preserved-rebuild count decreased. In my experience, it can
occasionally take a few runs to clear the
So on one machine yesterday I did emerge -DuN @world which then
suggested the need for emerge @preserved-rebuild which I did over
night. This morning it was finished but suggested the need for a
second emerge @preserved-rebuild. As I don't need the machine right
now I kicked it off and will check
On Thursday 12 November 2009 16:43:15 Mark Knecht wrote:
So on one machine yesterday I did emerge -DuN @world which then
suggested the need for emerge @preserved-rebuild which I did over
night. This morning it was finished but suggested the need for a
second emerge @preserved-rebuild. As I
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 12 November 2009 16:43:15 Mark Knecht wrote:
So on one machine yesterday I did emerge -DuN @world which then
suggested the need for emerge @preserved-rebuild which I did over
night. This morning it was
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thursday 12 November 2009 16:43:15 Mark Knecht wrote:
So on one machine yesterday I did emerge -DuN @world which then
suggested the need
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 12 November 2009 18:19:02 Mark Knecht wrote:
Again, thanks Alan. The second pass through finished up and the same
offending package (apparently e2fsprogs-libs ?) was still listed so
erasing the
On Thursday 12 November 2009 18:19:02 Mark Knecht wrote:
Again, thanks Alan. The second pass through finished up and the same
offending package (apparently e2fsprogs-libs ?) was still listed so
erasing the preserved_libs_registry file and using revdep-rebuild -i
suggests that the machine is
20 matches
Mail list logo
