Re: [gentoo-user] emerge output: [ebuild UD ]

2014-09-17 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 17/09/14 03:01, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 09/16/2014 03:14 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: For some reason xfce-power-manager-1.3.1 does not satisfy what the local install needs but 1.3.0 does. So portage wants to make it so. Version 1.3.1 was removed from the tree, leaving only 1.3.0 to

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge output: [ebuild UD ]

2014-09-17 Thread Alexander Kapshuk
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: On 17/09/14 03:01, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 09/16/2014 03:14 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: For some reason xfce-power-manager-1.3.1 does not satisfy what the local install needs but 1.3.0 does. So portage wants to make

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge output: [ebuild UD ]

2014-09-17 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 17/09/14 16:16, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: On 17/09/14 03:01, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 09/16/2014 03:14 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: For some reason xfce-power-manager-1.3.1 does not satisfy what the local install

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge output: [ebuild UD ]

2014-09-17 Thread Alexander Kapshuk
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: On 17/09/14 16:16, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: On 17/09/14 03:01, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 09/16/2014 03:14 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: For

[gentoo-user] emerge output: [ebuild UD ]

2014-09-16 Thread Alexander Kapshuk
Recently, I updated xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager to version 1.3.1, which is unstable, in order to prevent lvm2 from being pulled in as a dependency. grep xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager /etc/portage/package.* /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords:=xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager-1.3.1 ~x86 As I

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge output: [ebuild UD ]

2014-09-16 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 09/16/2014 11:51 AM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: Recently, I updated xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager to version 1.3.1, which is unstable, in order to prevent lvm2 from being pulled in as a dependency. [ebuild UD ] xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager-1.3.0 [1.3.1] USE=policykit udisks%* -debug

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge output: [ebuild UD ]

2014-09-16 Thread Alexander Kapshuk
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Michael Orlitzky m...@gentoo.org wrote: On 09/16/2014 11:51 AM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: Recently, I updated xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager to version 1.3.1, which is unstable, in order to prevent lvm2 from being pulled in as a dependency. [ebuild UD ]

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge output: [ebuild UD ]

2014-09-16 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 16/09/2014 17:51, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: Recently, I updated xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager to version 1.3.1, which is unstable, in order to prevent lvm2 from being pulled in as a dependency. grep xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager /etc/portage/package.*

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge output: [ebuild UD ]

2014-09-16 Thread Alexander Kapshuk
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On 16/09/2014 17:51, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: Recently, I updated xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager to version 1.3.1, which is unstable, in order to prevent lvm2 from being pulled in as a dependency. grep

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge output: [ebuild UD ]

2014-09-16 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 09/16/2014 03:14 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: For some reason xfce-power-manager-1.3.1 does not satisfy what the local install needs but 1.3.0 does. So portage wants to make it so. Version 1.3.1 was removed from the tree, leaving only 1.3.0 to satisfy XFCE_PLUGINS=battery/brightness.

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge output: [ebuild UD ]

2014-09-16 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 09/16/2014 12:39 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: Replacing brightness with power in XFCE_PLUGINS, followed by running 'emerge -avuND @world', still tried to downgrade the package in question. I then ran 'emerge -avuND 'xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager-1.3.1' which suggested adding

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge output: [ebuild UD ]

2014-09-16 Thread Alexander Kapshuk
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Michael Orlitzky m...@gentoo.org wrote: On 09/16/2014 12:39 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: Replacing brightness with power in XFCE_PLUGINS, followed by running 'emerge -avuND @world', still tried to downgrade the package in question. I then ran 'emerge -avuND

[gentoo-user] emerge output, screenshots and the list Was: fcitx crash, libpng cairo?

2013-04-13 Thread Stroller
On 13 April 2013, at 06:14, Jackie wrote: ... Tried to downgrade libpng cairo today but no luck… I've here got the snapshot of the infomation got after masking libpng-1.6.1 cairo-1.12.14.Hell No!snapshot7_libpng_slot.png I'm looking at your problem now to try and help you with it, but

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge output confusion regarding upgradeable packages

2008-05-12 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Monday 12 May 2008, PaulNM wrote: The fetch restriction is realplayer, and expected. The three upgrades are a complete surprise. I can't figure out why they're there. [ebuild     U ]  dev-python/dnspython-1.6.0 [1.5.0] USE=-examples 98 kB [ebuild     U ]  x11-apps/xcursorgen-1.0.2 [1.0.1]

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge output confusion regarding upgradeable packages

2008-05-12 Thread PaulNM
Alan McKinnon wrote: This is expected behaviour. The three packages you mention are not in world and thus don't form part of the initial search. Even though you are using -uN, nothing in world *requires* specifically those updated/latest versions, so they never make it into the dependency

[gentoo-user] emerge output confusion regarding upgradeable packages

2008-05-11 Thread PaulNM
Hey Folks, this one has me confused I use http-replicator, but that's not directly related to my problem, it's just how I discovered it. I occasionally prune the http-replicator cache by emptying every system's distfiles directory, then run emerge -fe world to download only the current

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge output

2005-08-26 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 01:27:11 +0100, Tony Davison wrote: There is a little gadget called 'enotice that I use but I';m b*d if I can remember where I got it from, perhaps the above URL. It's in the Gentoo Script Repository at http://gentooexperimental.org/script/repo/list An alternative is

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge output

2005-08-26 Thread Mariusz Pękala
On 2005-08-26 01:48:36 +0200 (Fri, Aug), Holly Bostick wrote: Idea #3: there is a way (and possibly more than one) to tail out the einfo messages, either to a file, or to the console, but unfortunately I don't remember what they are atm Oh, wait, they're listed on the Wiki:

RESOLVED: [gentoo-user] emerge output

2005-08-26 Thread John Dangler
PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 4:33 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge output On 2005-08-26 01:48:36 +0200 (Fri, Aug), Holly Bostick wrote: Idea #3: there is a way (and possibly more than one) to tail out the einfo messages, either to a file

[gentoo-user] emerge output

2005-08-25 Thread John Dangler
I just did an emerge uDv world during the course of the 22 packages (a lot considering I just loaded this last night), I got some messages saying please make sure you run (I couldnt read it all since it went by so fast) I got a couple of these before it was over. Is there a way to view

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge output

2005-08-25 Thread Holly Bostick
John Dangler schreef: I just did an emerge –uDv world… during the course of the 22 packages (a lot considering I just loaded this last night), I got some messages saying “please make sure you run … (I couldn’t read it all since it went by so fast)… I got a couple of these before it

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge output

2005-08-25 Thread Tony Davison
On Friday 26 August 2005 00:48, Holly Bostick wrote: John Dangler schreef: I just did an emerge –uDv world… during the course of the 22 packages (a lot considering I just loaded this last night), I got some messages saying “please make sure you run … (I couldn’t read it all since