On Friday 13 October 2006 18:56, maxim wexler wrote:
Hello group,
Interesting discussion here:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-478783.html
What does the group think?
-Maxim
I am not 'the group' but I am using etc-update. It is all that I need. I tried
dispatch-conf once and it was
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 11:46:16 +0200, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
Why? No need for that. etc-update covers all my needs - I don't have
stupid fingers...
My fingers aren't stupid, but they can be downright disobedient at
times :(
I prefer dispatch-conf, but not for the RCS feature, rdiff-backup
Hello group,
Interesting discussion here:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-478783.html
What does the group think?
-Maxim
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--
On Friday 13 October 2006 11:56, maxim wexler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about '[gentoo-user] etc-update vs dispatch-conf':
Interesting discussion here:
I didn't read it, but after I heard about dispatch-conf, I set it up to use
RCS and turned on all the auto-merge options and never looked back
On 10/13/06, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 13 October 2006 11:56, maxim wexler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about '[gentoo-user] etc-update vs dispatch-conf':
Interesting discussion here:
I didn't read it, but after I heard about dispatch-conf, I set it up to use
RCS
On 10/13/06, Justin Patrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/13/06, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 13 October 2006 11:56, maxim wexler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote about '[gentoo-user] etc-update vs dispatch-conf': Interesting discussion here: I didn't read it, but after I
dispatch-conf is just a more robust and
full-featured system for
updating config files. I read the first page of that
discussion and it
seems most of those who use etc-update haven't tried
dispatch-conf.
The rest feel they don't need the added features.
IMHO dispatch-conf
should be the
7 matches
Mail list logo
