After doing emerge --depclean on an amd64 machine, I find that Emacs
no longer locates the font it previously used. The font I liked was
specified in my .emacs file with the line
(set-default-font 10x20).
Using the old .emacs file and doing emacs --debug-init now
produces an error message that
I haven't checked lately, but when I upgraded to modular Xorg, the
following font package was missing:
media-fonts/font-schumacher-misc
I was unable to run a program I'd compiled myself---xtide.
Alan Davis
On 7/13/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Allan Gottlieb wrote:
I
Hello all,
I just completed upgrading to Xorg 7.0 and it went fine, however, I seem to be
missing Courier 10 pitch which was the only monospaced font that looks
decent on my screen. When I started X all my monospaced fonts were set as
courier which looks terrible.
Does anyone know where to
darren kirby wrote:
Hello all,
I just completed upgrading to Xorg 7.0 and it went fine, however, I seem to
be
missing Courier 10 pitch which was the only monospaced font that looks
decent on my screen. When I started X all my monospaced fonts were set as
courier which looks terrible.
quoth the Donnie Berkholz:
darren kirby wrote:
Hello all,
I just completed upgrading to Xorg 7.0 and it went fine, however, I seem
to be missing Courier 10 pitch which was the only monospaced font that
looks decent on my screen. When I started X all my monospaced fonts were
set as
darren kirby wrote:
quoth the Donnie Berkholz:
darren kirby wrote:
Hello all,
I just completed upgrading to Xorg 7.0 and it went fine, however, I seem
to be missing Courier 10 pitch which was the only monospaced font that
looks decent on my screen. When I started X all my monospaced fonts
At Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:50:11 -0700 Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
darren kirby wrote:
quoth the Donnie Berkholz:
Try font-adobe-100dpi or font-adobe-75dpi or possibly font-ibm-type1.
The adobe fonts were already installed (no 10 pitch) and I installed the IBM
fonts and it was
Allan Gottlieb wrote:
I notice that some of the fonts you mention are keyword masked (at
least on x86). For example font-bitstream-* (except for -vera) and
font-ibm-type1. Are these fonts less tested? Would you recommend
unmasking all of them? Would you want me to file a bug asking for
8 matches
Mail list logo
