Re: [gentoo-user] gcc -> texinfo dependency

2006-07-21 Thread Richard Fish
On 7/21/06, Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes, I can live absolutely w/o any docs. I find this incredibly ironic, considering that both of the portage questions you asked here today were answered with pointers to, or quotations of, the emerge man page :-/ -Richard -- gentoo-use

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc -> texinfo dependency

2006-07-04 Thread Richard Fish
On 7/4/06, Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: BTW: I don't need info pages at all, is there any useflag to completely disable the whole info stuff ? Um, for many (most?) GNU programs, the info documentation is the only sane documentation. Or are you saying you don't want any documentati

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc -> texinfo dependency

2006-07-04 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Rumen Yotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just checked and it's rather a DEPEND dependency not RDEPEND. > Means "texinfo" is needed only for building GCC, not for running it. So, I can simply remove it by hand after building gcc. > IIRC currently portage doesn't support removing DEPEND deps l

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc -> texinfo dependency

2006-06-30 Thread Rumen Yotov
Enrico Weigelt wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've seen, gcc has texinfo as rdependency. What does it need it for ? > I'd like to get rid of it. > > > cu Hi, Just checked and it's rather a DEPEND dependency not RDEPEND. Means "texinfo" is needed only for building GCC, not for running it. IIRC currently

[gentoo-user] gcc -> texinfo dependency

2006-06-30 Thread Enrico Weigelt
Hi folks, I've seen, gcc has texinfo as rdependency. What does it need it for ? I'd like to get rid of it. cu -- - Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de