On Friday 05 May 2006 08:12, Graham Murray wrote:
> "Hemmann, Volker Armin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > glibc updates NEVER need a rebuild.
> >
> > Only if you change from gcc 3.X to 4.Y you have to rebuild.
> >
> > But not because of a glibc update.
>
> That is not always true. A glibc upgrade
"Hemmann, Volker Armin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> glibc updates NEVER need a rebuild.
>
> Only if you change from gcc 3.X to 4.Y you have to rebuild.
>
> But not because of a glibc update.
That is not always true. A glibc upgrade *can* require that *some*
packages are re-built. I am not an e
On Thursday 04 May 2006 19:25, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'd now like to upgrade to glibc 2.4 as well. After having installed glibc
> 2.4, is it required to have a full "emerge -e world" run; ie. rebuild the
> entire system?
no.
glibc updates NEVER need a rebuild.
Only if you change fr
Hello!
I'd now like to upgrade to glibc 2.4 as well. After having installed glibc 2.4,
is it required to have a full "emerge -e world" run; ie. rebuild the entire
system?
Thanks,
Alexander Skwar
--
NATHAN ... your PARENTS were in a CARCRASH!! They're VOIDED -- They
COLLAPSED They had no CHAINS
4 matches
Mail list logo