On 02.04.2015 23:14, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Stefan, this is kinda stupid, but have you tried to re-emerge gummiboot?
nope
gummiboot was emerged here on march, 7th one day before I started
this thread.
I can reemerge, sure. Reboot right now ... not so ideal ...
On 09.03.2015 09:16, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
# ls -l loader/entries/
total 2
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 329 9. Mär 09:04
e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.0-gentoo.conf
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 329 9. Mär 09:01
e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
On 09.03.2015 09:16, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
# ls -l loader/entries/
total 2
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 329 9. Mär 09:04
e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.0-gentoo.conf
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 329 9. Mär
On Thursday, April 02, 2015 11:06:44 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
On 09.03.2015 09:16, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
# ls -l loader/entries/
total 2
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 329 9. Mär 09:04
e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.0-gentoo.conf
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 329 9. Mär 09:01
On 02.04.2015 23:21, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
I can reemerge, sure. Reboot right now ... not so ideal ...
ok, tried that. didn't change anything.
I can deal with it. It just doesn't work as expected.
On Sunday, March 08, 2015 11:11:49 AM Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 10:51:38 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Are the ownership and mode of
e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf the
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 1:11 AM, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
[...]
Canek,
I don't see these long filenames in your filetree-listing.
You have a directory with the UUID, but then just the kernel-version
numbers.
Or am I looking at the wrong email?
You are:
# tree -l /boot/loader/
On Monday, March 09, 2015 09:16:35 AM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
On 08.03.2015 23:20, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
On Sunday, March 08, 2015 10:37:22 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
... why my initrd is 21M is another question ..)
Do you have proprietary video drivers in it? fglrx alone is
On 08.03.2015 23:20, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
On Sunday, March 08, 2015 10:37:22 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
... why my initrd is 21M is another question ..)
Do you have proprietary video drivers in it? fglrx alone is 13 megs and if
it's for plymouth it doesnt use them so it's just
On 08.03.2015 19:10, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
But no big problem, I can edit that conf-file whenever I install a new
kernel. Sure, would be nice to solve.
fun fact:
compiled and installed 4.0.0-rc2 ... visible at boot time at first try
;-)
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
On 08.03.2015 19:10, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
But no big problem, I can edit that conf-file whenever I install a new
kernel. Sure, would be nice to solve.
fun fact:
compiled and installed 4.0.0-rc2 ... visible
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08.03.2015 21:21, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
Just a guess, if you move it back to the original name, does it
boot? Maybe there was something funny with the directory entry that
confused the bootloader's FAT driver and got fixed when you moved
On 08.03.2015 18:09, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
For the sake of testing it, I copied my 3.19.0 entry into a 3.18.9 and
3.19.1 entries and rebooted. Here it works fine Stefan (see attached
image); I don't know why it doesn't with yours.
I see you have some grub related files in your /boot
On 08.03.2015 21:17, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
fun fact:
compiled and installed 4.0.0-rc2 ... visible at boot time at first try
I hate heisenbugs.
;-)
On Sunday, March 08, 2015 8:57:43 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
On 08.03.2015 19:10, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
But no big problem, I can edit that conf-file whenever I install a new
kernel. Sure, would be nice to solve.
fun fact:
compiled and installed 4.0.0-rc2 ... visible at boot
On Sunday, March 08, 2015 10:37:22 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
On 08.03.2015 21:21, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
Just a guess, if you move it back to the original name, does it
boot? Maybe there was something funny with the directory entry that
confused the bootloader's FAT driver and got
Hmm, what is my mistake ...
I compiled the latest gentoo-sources-3.19.1 with Canek's kerninst tool.
It is configured to generate a loader-entry for the gummiboot bootloader.
That bootloader is the default entry in the UEFI boot order and it works
... I can boot the older kernels ... but it
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
I compiled the latest gentoo-sources-3.19.1 with Canek's kerninst tool.
It is configured to generate a loader-entry for the gummiboot bootloader.
That bootloader is the default entry in the UEFI boot order and it
On 08.03.2015 16:59, Tom H wrote:
Are the ownership and mode of
e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf the same as the
two others (although I'd assume that it wouldn't matter) and is it
formatted correctly?
Yes, I think so:
# ls -l /boot/loader/entries/
total 2
-rwxr-xr-x 1
On 08.03.2015 17:10, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
On 08.03.2015 16:59, Tom H wrote:
Are the ownership and mode of
e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf the same as the
two others (although I'd assume that it wouldn't matter) and is it
formatted correctly?
Yes, I think so:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
On 08.03.2015 16:59, Tom H wrote:
Are the ownership and mode of
e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf the same as the
two others (although I'd assume that it wouldn't matter) and is it
formatted
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at
wrote:
I compiled the latest gentoo-sources-3.19.1 with Canek's kerninst tool.
It is configured to generate a loader-entry for the gummiboot
bootloader.
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at
wrote:
On 08.03.2015 17:10, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
On 08.03.2015 16:59, Tom H wrote:
Are the ownership and mode of
e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf the same as the
two others (although I'd
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
[ ... ]
version?! I've never seen this and I don't use it.
From [1]:
The entry configuration files understand the following keywords:
title text to show in the menu
version version string to append to the title
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
moved e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf to simply
stefan.conf ... then it gets displayed (and boots fine as well)
maybe we should name the conf-files in a different way?
I listed my /boot set up in
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
The /boot partition in UEFI systems needs to be vfat. Permissions are not
gonna matter that much in that.
Very true. Stupid of me...
On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 10:51:38 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Are the ownership and mode of
e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf the same as the
two others (although I'd assume that it wouldn't matter) and is it
formatted correctly?
The /boot partition in UEFI systems
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 10:51:38 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Are the ownership and mode of
e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf the same as the
two others (although I'd assume that it wouldn't
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
version?! I've never seen this and I don't use it.
From [1]:
title text to show in the menu
version version string to append to the
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 10:51:38 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Are the ownership and mode of
e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf the same as the
two others (although I'd assume that it wouldn't matter) and
30 matches
Mail list logo
