[gentoo-user] iptables (not) started?

2013-03-29 Thread Jarry
Hi Gentoo-users, I noticed one thing on my server: during boot-up no message about firewall being started is printed on console. I always have to check manually if iptables-rules have been loaded. Strange thing, when doing shutdown, I see messages I expect: * Saving iptables state ...

Re: [gentoo-user] iptables (not) started?

2013-03-29 Thread Mick
On Friday 29 Mar 2013 18:25:11 Jarry wrote: Hi Gentoo-users, I noticed one thing on my server: during boot-up no message about firewall being started is printed on console. I always have to check manually if iptables-rules have been loaded. Strange thing, when doing shutdown, I see messages

Re: [gentoo-user] iptables (not) started?

2013-03-29 Thread Jarry
On 29-Mar-13 19:43, Mick wrote: On Friday 29 Mar 2013 18:25:11 Jarry wrote: Hi Gentoo-users, I noticed one thing on my server: during boot-up no message about firewall being started is printed on console. I always have to check manually if iptables-rules have been loaded. Strange thing, when

Re: [gentoo-user] iptables (not) started?

2013-03-29 Thread Pandu Poluan
On Mar 30, 2013 1:27 AM, Jarry mr.ja...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Gentoo-users, I noticed one thing on my server: during boot-up no message about firewall being started is printed on console. I always have to check manually if iptables-rules have been loaded. Strange thing, when doing shutdown, I

Re: [gentoo-user] iptables (not) started?

2013-03-29 Thread Mick
On Friday 29 Mar 2013 19:03:57 Jarry wrote: On 29-Mar-13 19:43, Mick wrote: On Friday 29 Mar 2013 18:25:11 Jarry wrote: Hi Gentoo-users, I noticed one thing on my server: during boot-up no message about firewall being started is printed on console. I always have to check manually if

Re: [gentoo-user] iptables (not) started?

2013-03-29 Thread Mick
On Friday 29 Mar 2013 19:34:39 Mick wrote: On Friday 29 Mar 2013 19:03:57 Jarry wrote: On 29-Mar-13 19:43, Mick wrote: On Friday 29 Mar 2013 18:25:11 Jarry wrote: Hi Gentoo-users, I noticed one thing on my server: during boot-up no message about firewall being started is printed

Re: [gentoo-user] iptables (not) started?

2013-03-29 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 19:44:14 +, Mick wrote: Why do wikis and the like suggest that iptables should be in default rather than boot runlevel? Why not? There's no need to start it especially early, as long as it is running before the network comes up, and the init script takes care of that.

Re: [gentoo-user] iptables (not) started?

2013-03-29 Thread Mick
On Friday 29 Mar 2013 20:37:20 Neil Bothwick wrote: On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 19:44:14 +, Mick wrote: Why do wikis and the like suggest that iptables should be in default rather than boot runlevel? Why not? There's no need to start it especially early, as long as it is running before the

Re: [gentoo-user] iptables (not) started?

2013-03-29 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 23:29:39 +, Mick wrote: Why do wikis and the like suggest that iptables should be in default rather than boot runlevel? Why not? There's no need to start it especially early, as long as it is running before the network comes up, and the init script takes