On Sat, 16 May 2015 08:57:15 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
Does that include the several lines of comments, often repeated, that
portage includes in the auto-unmask output? I just checked two systems
for abi_x86_32 and got around 130 lines in one and 220 in the other.
Yes, it does. The
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 8:53 AM, gevisz gev...@gmail.com wrote:
I am inattentive today. :(
Some blockers remained but I hope it will not broke the system.
...
[blocks b ] dev-qt/assistant-4.8.6:4
(dev-qt/assistant-4.8.6:4 is blocking dev-qt/qtchooser-0_p20150102)
...
Would you like to
2015-05-16 15:50 GMT+03:00 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com:
On 16/05/2015 09:51, gevisz wrote:
2015-05-16 9:44 GMT+03:00 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com:
On 16/05/2015 07:52, gevisz wrote:
2015-05-15 20:30 GMT+03:00 Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com:
On Fri, May 15,
2015-05-16 17:12 GMT+03:00 Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org:
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 8:53 AM, gevisz gev...@gmail.com wrote:
I am inattentive today. :(
Some blockers remained but I hope it will not broke the system.
...
[blocks b ] dev-qt/assistant-4.8.6:4
(dev-qt/assistant-4.8.6:4 is
On Sat, 16 May 2015 07:16:58 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
Unless your screen is IMAX-sized, two screens of text is a lot more
lightfooted than add extra libraries to nearly 200 packages - and most
of that text is comments anyway.
Well, it can be a lot more than two screens of text. I
On 16/05/2015 09:51, gevisz wrote:
2015-05-16 9:44 GMT+03:00 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com:
On 16/05/2015 07:52, gevisz wrote:
2015-05-15 20:30 GMT+03:00 Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Gevisz gev...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2015
2015-05-16 11:26 GMT+03:00 gevisz gev...@gmail.com:
2015-05-16 10:51 GMT+03:00 gevisz gev...@gmail.com:
2015-05-16 9:44 GMT+03:00 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com:
On 16/05/2015 07:52, gevisz wrote:
2015-05-15 20:30 GMT+03:00 Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com:
On Fri, May 15,
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2015 07:16:58 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
Well, it can be a lot more than two screens of text. I have 1300
lines of package.use, almost all of it for abi_x86_32. I suspect that
this the result of stuff
On 16/05/2015 07:52, gevisz wrote:
2015-05-15 20:30 GMT+03:00 Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Gevisz gev...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2015 01:45:35 -0400 Gregory Woodbury redwo...@gmail.com
wrote:
I had a similar problem with some
2015-05-16 9:44 GMT+03:00 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com:
On 16/05/2015 07:52, gevisz wrote:
2015-05-15 20:30 GMT+03:00 Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Gevisz gev...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2015 01:45:35 -0400 Gregory Woodbury
2015-05-16 10:51 GMT+03:00 gevisz gev...@gmail.com:
2015-05-16 9:44 GMT+03:00 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com:
On 16/05/2015 07:52, gevisz wrote:
2015-05-15 20:30 GMT+03:00 Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Gevisz gev...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On Saturday 16 May 2015 09:26:14 gevisz wrote:
2015-05-16 10:51 GMT+03:00 gevisz gev...@gmail.com:
So, if I get no better suggestions, I will enable abi_x86_32
globally and try to update the world once more.
Lukily, this approach worked out. Currently I am updating
2015-05-16 11:55 GMT+03:00 Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com:
On Saturday 16 May 2015 09:26:14 gevisz wrote:
2015-05-16 10:51 GMT+03:00 gevisz gev...@gmail.com:
So, if I get no better suggestions, I will enable abi_x86_32
globally and try to update the world once more.
Lukily,
On Sat, 16 May 2015 13:10:21 +0300, gevisz wrote:
I'm afraid I cannot agree with you on this. On older PCs I would
rather did not have to install abi_x86_32 for packages that I don't
need to. The granular approach suits me better and also aligns
better with the light-footed Gentoo
On Saturday 16 May 2015 11:10:21 gevisz wrote:
2015-05-16 11:55 GMT+03:00 Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com:
I'm afraid I cannot agree with you on this. On older PCs I would rather
did not have to install abi_x86_32 for packages that I don't need to.
The granular approach suits me better
2015-05-16 13:20 GMT+03:00 Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk:
On Sat, 16 May 2015 13:10:21 +0300, gevisz wrote:
I'm afraid I cannot agree with you on this. On older PCs I would
rather did not have to install abi_x86_32 for packages that I don't
need to. The granular approach suits me
2015-05-16 13:33 GMT+03:00 Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com:
On Saturday 16 May 2015 11:10:21 gevisz wrote:
2015-05-16 11:55 GMT+03:00 Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com:
I'm afraid I cannot agree with you on this. On older PCs I would rather
did not have to install abi_x86_32 for packages that
On Saturday 16 May 2015 11:40:01 gevisz wrote:
2015-05-16 13:20 GMT+03:00 Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk:
As Mick says, you get to choose, but the per-package approach is
definitely lighter on the system. Enabling it globally may be less work
though. I say may because when I tried that
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2015 13:10:21 +0300, gevisz wrote:
I'm afraid I cannot agree with you on this. On older PCs I would
rather did not have to install abi_x86_32 for packages that I don't
need to. The granular approach
2015-05-16 13:10 GMT+03:00 gevisz gev...@gmail.com:
2015-05-16 11:55 GMT+03:00 Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com:
On Saturday 16 May 2015 09:26:14 gevisz wrote:
2015-05-16 10:51 GMT+03:00 gevisz gev...@gmail.com:
So, if I get no better suggestions, I will enable abi_x86_32
On Sat, 16 May 2015 11:52:48 +0100, Mick wrote:
PS. I'm waiting for Neil's uncanny signature which if it works
correctly it should come with something like: Nostalgia, it's not
what it used to be LOL!
You can't force these things, it's not uncanny if it's deliberate.
--
Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 15 May 2015 01:45:35 -0400 Gregory Woodbury redwo...@gmail.com wrote:
I had a similar problem with some packages wanting virtual/ffmpeg and
it wouldn't take the -libav USE flag without adding a keyword for
~amd64 on the virtual.
(yes, I am going the opposite way from you, but the
2015-05-15 20:30 GMT+03:00 Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Gevisz gev...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2015 01:45:35 -0400 Gregory Woodbury redwo...@gmail.com
wrote:
I had a similar problem with some packages wanting virtual/ffmpeg and
it
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Gevisz gev...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2015 01:45:35 -0400 Gregory Woodbury redwo...@gmail.com
wrote:
I had a similar problem with some packages wanting virtual/ffmpeg and
it wouldn't take the -libav USE flag without adding a keyword for
~amd64 on
On Friday 15 May 2015 18:30:29 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Gevisz gev...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2015 01:45:35 -0400 Gregory Woodbury redwo...@gmail.com
wrote:
I had a similar problem with some packages wanting virtual/ffmpeg and
it wouldn't
I had a similar problem with some packages wanting virtual/ffmpeg and
it wouldn't take the -libav USE flag without adding a keyword for
~amd64 on the virtual.
(yes, I am going the opposite way from you, but the cause seem the
same -- various USE flags are not yet adjusted in the stable
branches.)
After Gentoo devs decided to switch back to ffmpeg default,
I set libav USE flag at my /etc/portage/make.conf
and was happy with that so far. :)
However, after yesterday's
# emerge-webrsync
# emerge --update --deep --with-bdeps=y --newuse --backtrack=90 --ask world
I've got some blocks that in my
27 matches
Mail list logo
