I just use bind - setup to lookup from my ISP's nameservers and cache only.
The main reason for this was my ISP's ones are very slow (sometime 0.5 s
to resolve!) - turning on the cache made an enormous difference to the
perceived performance.
Cheers
Mark
Ralf Stephan wrote:
Hello,
I'm fed
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 17:01:33 +0200, Ralf Stephan wrote:
> > I use dnsmasq, can be used as a LAN cache too (by simply allowing
> > requests from a given interface). Took me about 30 minutes to
> > configure. I asked dhcp to save to resolv.conf.2 and made resolv.conf
> > to request from localhost.
Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
Hi!
=== On Wednesday 09 April 2008, you wrote: ===
...
Does not seem to matter here much, since I suspend, not turn off. But
anyway, most DNS names should be cached only few hours, half a day or
so (well, there are some that have week long timeouts, but not many).
vorner wrote
> I use dnsmasq, can be used as a LAN cache too (by simply allowing
> requests from a given interface). Took me about 30 minutes to configure.
> I asked dhcp to save to resolv.conf.2 and made resolv.conf to request
> from localhost.
OK this works fine, thanks. However, udhcpd cannt b
Ralf Stephan ha scritto:
Hello,
I'm fed up with waiting for ever the same name requests from my
browser (and open servers don't cut it either): which DNS cache
or caching DNS for simple local installation would you recommend?
Regards,
ralf
what about dnscache of djbdns tools?
took 2 minutes
Hi!
=== On Wednesday 09 April 2008, you wrote: ===
...
>
> Does not seem to matter here much, since I suspend, not turn off. But
> anyway, most DNS names should be cached only few hours, half a day or
> so (well, there are some that have week long timeouts, but not many).
Not sure I have n
On Wed, 09 Apr 2008, Ralf Stephan wrote:
> I'm fed up with waiting for ever the same name requests from my
> browser (and open servers don't cut it either): which DNS cache
> or caching DNS for simple local installation would you recommend?
I'm using the DNS of my router (D-Link DSL-500G). Works
Hello
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 02:45:18PM +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 12:13:40PM +0200, Ralf Stephan wrote:
> > > I'm fed up with waiting for ever the same name requests from my
> > > browser (and open servers don't cut it either): which DNS cache
> > > or caching DNS
=== On Wednesday 09 April 2008, Michal 'vorner' Vaner wrote: ===
> Hello
>
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 12:13:40PM +0200, Ralf Stephan wrote:
> > I'm fed up with waiting for ever the same name requests from my
> > browser (and open servers don't cut it either): which DNS cache
> > or caching D
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 12:13:40 +0200, Ralf Stephan wrote:
> I'm fed up with waiting for ever the same name requests from my
> browser (and open servers don't cut it either): which DNS cache
> or caching DNS for simple local installation would you recommend?
net-dns/dnsmasq
--
Neil Bothwick
Deja
Hello
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 12:13:40PM +0200, Ralf Stephan wrote:
> I'm fed up with waiting for ever the same name requests from my
> browser (and open servers don't cut it either): which DNS cache
> or caching DNS for simple local installation would you recommend?
I use dnsmasq, can be used as
Hello,
I'm fed up with waiting for ever the same name requests from my
browser (and open servers don't cut it either): which DNS cache
or caching DNS for simple local installation would you recommend?
Regards,
ralf
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
12 matches
Mail list logo
