* de Almeida, Valmor F. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 19. Nov 07:
> >>From: Mark Shields [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >On Nov 19, 2007 12:03 PM, de Almeida, Valmor F. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >Is this execution time expected?
Yes, I can confirm that. In addition you should run it mo
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bryan
>
> memtest86 will keep retesting your memory over and over. Look at the
> "Pass" and "Errors" column. If Errors is 0 and Pass is more than 1,
> your memory is fine. If Pass is 0 and Errors is 0, th
memtest86 will keep retesting your memory over and over. Look at the
"Pass" and "Errors" column. If Errors is 0 and Pass is more than 1,
your memory is fine. If Pass is 0 and Errors is 0, then it is still on
the "first run". It shouldn't take this long. In that case make sure
you have the latest ve
On Montag, 19. November 2007, de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote:
> >>
> >>From: Mark Shields [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >On Nov 19, 2007 12:03 PM, de Almeida, Valmor F. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >Is this execution ti
>>
>>From: Mark Shields [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>On Nov 19, 2007 12:03 PM, de Almeida, Valmor F. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Is this execution time expected?
>Thanks for any comments,
>--
>Valmor de Almeida
On Nov 19, 2007 12:03 PM, de Almeida, Valmor F. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> After looking at the /var/log/messages file, I saw an entry which seemed
> to indicate a memory address problem. I decided to run memtest86+.
> However it is taking too long. So far 17 hours and still going.
Hello,
After looking at the /var/log/messages file, I saw an entry which seemed
to indicate a memory address problem. I decided to run memtest86+.
However it is taking too long. So far 17 hours and still going. The
"Pass" field reads 25%; I hope this is an indication of how much of the
total has
7 matches
Mail list logo
