Re: [gentoo-user] mysql is being pulled in again!

2010-03-05 Thread Mick
On 5 March 2010 09:42, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 06:53:15 +, Mick wrote: > >> I was trying to understand why a virtual package like virtual/mysql is >> pulling in dev-db/mysql and I used the syslog virtual/real >> relationship as an analogy. > > The clue is in the name of the v

Re: [gentoo-user] mysql is being pulled in again!

2010-03-05 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 06:53:15 +, Mick wrote: > I was trying to understand why a virtual package like virtual/mysql is > pulling in dev-db/mysql and I used the syslog virtual/real > relationship as an analogy. The clue is in the name of the virtual, it is satisfied by one of the MySQL packages i

Re: [gentoo-user] mysql is being pulled in again!

2010-03-04 Thread Mick
On 4 March 2010 20:07, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Thursday 04 March 2010 19:07:22 Mick wrote: >> > There will be a reason why mysql is being pulled in, most likely a >> > package that must have it. >> >> If a package must have it, wouldn't the USE flag mysql switch to + ? > > Your post seems to ind

Re: [gentoo-user] mysql is being pulled in again!

2010-03-04 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 22:07:14 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > Again, you appear to fail to understand. metalog supports a variety of > database backends. Not all apps are like this, some are hard-coded. If > you want to use an app like this, you have no choice but to install > mysql. > > If you don'

Re: [gentoo-user] mysql is being pulled in again!

2010-03-04 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Thursday 04 March 2010 19:07:22 Mick wrote: > > There will be a reason why mysql is being pulled in, most likely a > > package that must have it. > > If a package must have it, wouldn't the USE flag mysql switch to + ? Your post seems to indicate a lack of understanding of how these things wor

Re: [gentoo-user] mysql is being pulled in again!

2010-03-04 Thread Roy Wright
Since you already merged it in: # equery depends mysql then unmerge or correct USE flags for dependent apps. To have portage error out instead of merging mysql in the future: # echo "dev-db/mysql" >/etc/portage/package.mask/I_said_no_mysql HTH, Roy

Re: [gentoo-user] mysql is being pulled in again!

2010-03-04 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 17:07:22 +, Mick wrote: > > The tool you want to answer this question is > > > > emerge -t > > Right, but I started this mammoth emerge before I spent enough time > looking at its contents I'm afraid. The use emerge --depclean -pv dev-db/mysql > > There will be a reason w

Re: [gentoo-user] mysql is being pulled in again!

2010-03-04 Thread Mick
On 4 March 2010 15:57, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Thursday 04 March 2010 17:37:23 Mick wrote: >> I am trying to understand what is pulling in mysql again.  This >> morning a load of qt packages were being updated and I noticed a bunch >> of perl and virtual packages in there too.  Rest assured dev-

Re: [gentoo-user] mysql is being pulled in again!

2010-03-04 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 17:57:15 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > The tool you want to answer this question is > > emerge -t > > There will be a reason why mysql is being pulled in, most likely a > package that must have it. I notice qt-sql is in the list, does that have the mysql flag forced on? --

Re: [gentoo-user] mysql is being pulled in again!

2010-03-04 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Thursday 04 March 2010 17:37:23 Mick wrote: > I am trying to understand what is pulling in mysql again. This > morning a load of qt packages were being updated and I noticed a bunch > of perl and virtual packages in there too. Rest assured dev-db/mysql > was in there, again. This is despite t

[gentoo-user] mysql is being pulled in again!

2010-03-04 Thread Mick
I am trying to understand what is pulling in mysql again. This morning a load of qt packages were being updated and I noticed a bunch of perl and virtual packages in there too. Rest assured dev-db/mysql was in there, again. This is despite the fact that the mysql use flag seem to be not active a