Re: [gentoo-user] portage has 0 debugging support for binary emerges

On 9/6/21 6:26 PM, n952162 wrote: On 9/6/21 3:48 PM, n952162 wrote: On 4/3/21 10:03 PM, n952162 wrote: I find no clue why the binary packages on my server aren't being picked up.  The --debug option  (and --verbose, naturally) has no additional information.  Running the --getbinpkgonly stops

Re: [gentoo-user] portage has 0 debugging support for binary emerges

On 9/6/21 3:48 PM, n952162 wrote: On 4/3/21 10:03 PM, n952162 wrote: I find no clue why the binary packages on my server aren't being picked up.  The --debug option  (and --verbose, naturally) has no additional information.  Running the --getbinpkgonly stops immediately, saying 0 packages are

Re: [gentoo-user] portage has 0 debugging support for binary emerges

On 4/3/21 10:03 PM, n952162 wrote: I find no clue why the binary packages on my server aren't being picked up.  The --debug option  (and --verbose, naturally) has no additional information.  Running the --getbinpkgonly stops immediately, saying 0 packages are selected. I found one problem: on

Re: [gentoo-user] portage has 0 debugging support for binary emerges

On 4/4/21 6:41 AM, n952162 wrote: On 4/4/21 12:37 PM, n952162 wrote: After re-running quickpkg, I still get no "binary"s in the emerge output dependency tree. At some point, I started getting 304 errors here again. |304 Not Modified|

Re: [gentoo-user] portage has 0 debugging support for binary emerges

On 4/4/21 12:37 PM, n952162 wrote: After re-running quickpkg, I still get no "binary"s in the emerge output dependency tree. At some point, I started getting 304 errors here again. |304 Not Modified| This is used for

Re: [gentoo-user] portage has 0 debugging support for binary emerges

On 4/4/21 10:56 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 10:33:15 +0200, n952162 wrote: [ebuild   R    ]    dev-libs/libuv-1.40.0:0/1::gentoo USE="-static-libs" 0 KiB I'm not sure where the static-libs USE flag comes from, it's not in /etc/portage/package.use. The flag is defined in the

Re: [gentoo-user] portage has 0 debugging support for binary emerges

On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 10:33:15 +0200, n952162 wrote: > [ebuild   R    ]    dev-libs/libuv-1.40.0:0/1::gentoo USE="-static-libs" > 0 KiB > > I'm not sure where the static-libs USE flag comes from, it's not in > /etc/portage/package.use. The flag is defined in the ebuild and defaults to off. > I

Re: [gentoo-user] portage has 0 debugging support for binary emerges

On 4/4/21 12:31 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sat, 3 Apr 2021 22:03:46 +0200, n952162 wrote: I find no clue why the binary packages on my server aren't being picked up.  The --debug option  (and --verbose, naturally) has no additional information.  Running the --getbinpkgonly stops immediately,

Re: [gentoo-user] portage has 0 debugging support for binary emerges

On Sat, 3 Apr 2021 22:03:46 +0200, n952162 wrote: > I find no clue why the binary packages on my server aren't being picked > up.  The --debug option  (and --verbose, naturally) has no additional > information.  Running the --getbinpkgonly stops immediately, saying 0 > packages are selected. > >

[gentoo-user] portage has 0 debugging support for binary emerges

I find no clue why the binary packages on my server aren't being picked up.  The --debug option  (and --verbose, naturally) has no additional information.  Running the --getbinpkgonly stops immediately, saying 0 packages are selected. I found one problem: on my server, my apache log file had a