[gentoo-user] samba vs. cifs

2010-05-05 Thread KH
Hi List, I just ran in a problem: net-fs/mount-cifs (net-fs/mount-cifs is blocking net-fs/samba-3.4.6) Somba is pulled in by the samba use-flag. The PC only is client to a server running samba. Do I need samba for this anymore? More specific (don't want to hear moo): Will I be able to mount

Re: [gentoo-user] samba vs. cifs

2010-05-05 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 05 May 2010 18:42:09 +0200, KH wrote: net-fs/mount-cifs (net-fs/mount-cifs is blocking net-fs/samba-3.4.6) mount.cifs is now provided by Samba. Somba is pulled in by the samba use-flag. The PC only is client to a server running samba. Do I need samba for this anymore? More specific

Re: [gentoo-user] samba vs. cifs

2010-05-05 Thread Matt Harrison
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 06:42:09PM +0200, KH wrote: Hi List, I just ran in a problem: net-fs/mount-cifs (net-fs/mount-cifs is blocking net-fs/samba-3.4.6) Somba is pulled in by the samba use-flag. The PC only is client to a server running samba. Do I need samba for this anymore? More

Re: [gentoo-user] samba vs. cifs

2010-05-05 Thread David W Noon
On Wed, 05 May 2010 23:20:01 +0200, Matt Harrison wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] samba vs. cifs: On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 06:42:09PM +0200, KH wrote: [snip] specific (don't want to hear moo): Will I be able to mount a samba partition without setting the samba use flag and after unmerging samba