On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 5:15 AM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/14/14 23:39, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
[snip]
It means that openrc users should strongly consider migrate to eudev.
I use eudev since its beta and never had any issue, nor systemd
leaking into my system. And in addition add
On 6/14/2014 7:08 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
The answer is *always in the ebuild and Changelog.
I agree that, now that I know what and why, that it didn't rate a news
item, but - especially with respect to anything related to the touchy
subject of systemd/openrc - some
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 6/14/2014 2:15 PM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org
wrote:
On 6/14/2014 1:02 PM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at
On 15/06/2014 16:48, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 6/14/2014 7:08 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
The answer is *always in the ebuild and Changelog.
I agree that, now that I know what and why, that it didn't rate a news
item, but - especially with respect to anything related to the
Is this right?
# eix udev
...
[U] sys-fs/udev
Available versions: 208-r1^t 212-r1^t ~213^t **^t {acl doc +firmware-loader gudev
introspection +kmod selinux static-libs ABI_MIPS=n32 n64 o32 ABI_X86=32 64
x32}
Installed versions: 208^t{tbz2}(03:30:13 PM 12/08/2013)(acl
On 14/06/2014 15:30, Tanstaafl wrote:
Is this right?
# eix udev
...
[U] sys-fs/udev
Available versions: 208-r1^t 212-r1^t ~213^t **^t {acl doc
+firmware-loader gudev introspection +kmod selinux static-libs
ABI_MIPS=n32 n64 o32 ABI_X86=32 64 x32}
Installed versions:
Thanks Alan, but...
On 6/14/2014 10:16 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/06/2014 15:30, Tanstaafl wrote:
This clearly shows the -openrc USE flag being applied.
You read it wrong. The USE flag is not being applied it's being removed
(the minus -),
Well, I did include
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Ok, that explains the meaning of the (), but doesn't explain this *change*
satisfactorily (to a non-coder at least)...
*Why* was it removed/no longer needed? And why was it needed previously?
Read the ChangeLog for
On 6/14/2014 1:02 PM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
*Why* was it removed/no longer needed? And why was it needed previously?
Read the ChangeLog for sys-fs/udev, specifically the entry on 03 Apr 2014.
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Still, for those of us who actually look at what is about to happen, and
notice a change like this that could potentially cause boot problems
(udev+openrc), it would be nice.
I think it makes more sense to limit news
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 6/14/2014 1:02 PM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org
wrote:
*Why* was it removed/no longer needed? And why was it needed previously?
Read
On 6/14/2014 2:15 PM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 6/14/2014 1:02 PM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org
wrote:
*Why* was it removed/no
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 6/14/2014 2:15 PM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org
wrote:
On 6/14/2014 1:02 PM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Alon Bar-Lev alo...@gentoo.org wrote:
And in addition add the following at
make.conf, as it seems that we are enforced to have files we never
use.
Hate to break the news to you, but by your definition you're
enforced to have thousands of files you never use on
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Alon Bar-Lev alo...@gentoo.org wrote:
And in addition add the following at
make.conf, as it seems that we are enforced to have files we never
use.
Hate to break the news to you, but by
On 14/06/2014 16:31, Tanstaafl wrote:
Thanks Alan, but...
On 6/14/2014 10:16 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/06/2014 15:30, Tanstaafl wrote:
This clearly shows the -openrc USE flag being applied.
You read it wrong. The USE flag is not being applied it's being removed
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
The answer is *always in the ebuild and Changelog.
Sometimes it's on Google too, but that is unreliable.
In general the stance is supposed to be that if it doesn't have a news
item, it shouldn't be a high-impact
On 06/14/14 23:39, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
[snip]
It means that openrc users should strongly consider migrate to eudev.
I use eudev since its beta and never had any issue, nor systemd
leaking into my system. And in addition add the following at
make.conf, as it seems that we are enforced to have
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Alon Bar-Lev alo...@gentoo.org wrote:
INSTALL_MASK=/lib/systemd /lib32/systemd /lib64/systemd
/usr/lib/systemd /usr/lib32/systemd /usr/lib64/systemd /etc/systemd
Warning to the reader: Please do not copy/paste this particular
INSTALL_MASK setting. It may work
19 matches
Mail list logo
