On Tuesday 12 July 2005 19:50, Tom Wesley wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:26:14 +0200
I haven't seen anyone post this script as yet. It's by ciaranm and is
very useful when people ask on irc why a certain package version can't
be installed on their arch.
Sample output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ 0
Rudmer van Dijk schreef:
Holly: eix is probably not it, since it looks like it does not show the
availability of the package (masked+keyword), but thanks for the suggestion!
Rudmer
Actually, it most certainly does; keyworded packages are shown in brown
with a ~ in front, masked
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:26:14 +0200
Holly Bostick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rudmer van Dijk schreef:
Holly: eix is probably not it, since it looks like it does not show the
availability of the package (masked+keyword), but thanks for the suggestion!
Rudmer
Actually, it most
etcat is deprecated in favor of equery but equery does not have a
functionality like `etcat -v package` (listing all available versions of a
package). I used it quite often and have been struggling with equery ever
since etcat is deprecated... Are there plans to build this functionality into
Rudmer van Dijk schreef:
etcat is deprecated in favor of equery but equery does not have a
functionality like `etcat -v package` (listing all available versions of a
package). I used it quite often and have been struggling with equery ever
since etcat is deprecated... Are there plans to
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 23:25:06 +0200 Rudmer van Dijk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
etcat is deprecated in favor of equery but equery does not have a
functionality like `etcat -v package` (listing all available
versions of a package). I used it quite often and have been
struggling with equery ever
On 7/11/05, Rudmer van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
etcat is deprecated in favor of equery but equery does not have a
functionality like `etcat -v package` (listing all available versions of a
package). I used it quite often and have been struggling with equery ever
since etcat is
7 matches
Mail list logo
