Re: Pentium M is actually quite good. (Was: Re: Laptop_Mode was[Re: [OT] Ext3 Speed Issues? (Was: Re: [gentoo-user] file system corrupted)])

2005-04-14 Thread Byron Pezan
Nick Rout wrote:

On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 11:58:39 -0400
Byron Pezan wrote:



  

FYI here is an lspci output from a Dell Centrino machine.  The Broadcom
entry at the bottom is the builtin wireless card, which incidentally
only works with NDISWrapper.



AFAIK the Centrino branding requires Intel/PRO wireless stuff, not
broadcom. How does your machine get a centrino sticker? or is broadcom a 
rebadged intel wireless set? or has the standard been relaxed?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrino

http://www.intel.com/products/centrino/

[snip]
  

Controller (rev 20)
:02:03.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4306 802.11b/g
Wireless LAN Controller (rev 03)

Byron
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



  

I don't know that I have a good answer to that, a quick Google search
did not reveal much.  I believe that in the early days of Centrino Intel
was forced to partner with other WIFI chip makers to meet their release
date.  Which may have set the standard lower than was expected from the
very beginning.  It may also be as simple as the chassis being
pre-stickered Centrino and assembled with a Broadcom chip due to a back
order on the Intel chips.

Byron
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: Pentium M is actually quite good. (Was: Re: Laptop_Mode was[Re: [OT] Ext3 Speed Issues? (Was: Re: [gentoo-user] file system corrupted)])

2005-04-14 Thread Travis Rousseau
On 4/12/05, Charles Pittman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 4/12/05, Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  
  On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 07:26:39 -0400
  Charles Pittman wrote:
  
Do all Pentium M processors have integrated wireless? I guess that
 would
   explain the wireless on/off button on the left-had side of my laptop
 (which 
   I can't use, because no program recognizes any of those hotkeys).
  
  No pentium m processors have integrated wireless. the pentium m is a
  cpu.
  
  However centrino machines have built in wireless, its part of the 
  centrino spec. centrino also uses pentium m. but just because your
  machine has a pentium-m cpu, doesn't make it centrino.
  
  lspci should tell you if you have a wireless chipset in your machine. If
 it has a centrino sticker, then it should have wireless.
  
  Hope that clears up the confusion.
  
  --
  Nick Rout
Ha I was told it would cost extra to get a computer without windows.
(somethin like $80)

I think windows devalues the computers

Travis R.

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: Pentium M is actually quite good. (Was: Re: Laptop_Mode was[Re: [OT] Ext3 Speed Issues? (Was: Re: [gentoo-user] file system corrupted)])

2005-04-14 Thread Robert G. Hays
Travis Rousseau wrote:
snip
Ha I was told it would cost extra to get a computer without windows.
(somethin like $80)
Yes, *WHY* does it cost more without WindoZZZe?  (Answer: Because 
MonopolSoft threatens vendors into doing this.) 
I suggest NOT buying from vendors that do this. 
If Linux ever reeally becomes *important* in the $$market, they'll pay 
for that behavior.
Hopefully, that will feed back to MS  hurt them even more.

I think windows devalues the computers
Travis R.
(I collect cool sigs etc...)
Mordjah on LQO (LinuxQuestions.org):
.Computers are like Air Conditioners.. they stop working when you 
open windows.

Buy4now!,
rgh.

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


Re: Pentium M is actually quite good. (Was: Re: Laptop_Mode was[Re: [OT] Ext3 Speed Issues? (Was: Re: [gentoo-user] file system corrupted)])

2005-04-12 Thread Charles Pittman
On Apr 12, 2005 12:09 AM, Peter Gordon  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Jerry McBride wrote: Because I KNOW it works on AMD mobile chips, first hand. I've never even looked at Intel mobile processors Probably never will...Don't disregard the Pentium M so quickly. The Pentium4 is a _horrible_architecture: Intel wanted a CPU that could be clocked _very_ fast (I think thecurrent top speed is ~3.4 GHz). However, the P4 can't really do a lot per cycle.The Pentium M[1] though..wow. That's actually a really great chip. They (Intel)took the awesomeness of the Pentium3 family, added the cool SSE stuff from theP4, gave it a lot of on-die cache (the Dothan core has 2 MB L2 cache), increasedthe instruction pipline, and also made it consume a _lot_ less power. In fact,when the P4 came out originally I honestly thought that it would be the end ofIntel; then they started producing their Centrino[2] laptop chipset (Pentium Mwith Intel mobile chipset and integrated Intel PRO/Wireless). It consumes verylittle power but it can perform really well. In fact, My brother gave me a goodrule-of-thumb about this when he was explaining it to me a while back: Add 1 GHzor so and that's the equivalently rated P4. For example, a 1.5 GHz Pentium Mwill likely perform just as well, if not better, then a ~2.5 GHz Pentium 4.[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_M[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrino--()The ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML Email,/\vCards, and proprietary formats.---Peter A. Gordon (codergeek42)E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]GPG Public Key ID: 0x109DBECEGPG Key Fingerprint (SHA1): E485 E2F7 11CE F9B2 E3D9 C95D 208F B732 109D BECEEncrypted and/or Signed correspondence preffered.GPG Public Key available upon request or from pgp.mit.edu's public key server.---
Do all Pentium M processors have integrated
wireless? I guess that would explain the wireless on/off button on the
left-had side of my laptop (which I can't use, because no program
recognizes any of those hotkeys).

Re: Pentium M is actually quite good. (Was: Re: Laptop_Mode was[Re: [OT] Ext3 Speed Issues? (Was: Re: [gentoo-user] file system corrupted)])

2005-04-12 Thread Richard Fish
Ow Mun Heng wrote:

On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 22:05 -0700, Peter Gordon wrote:
  

Isn't that what the -march=pentium-m and -mtune=pentium-m flags are for in
GCC 3.4?



That's what it should be for. Friend of mine used 3.4 on a BSD machine
to compile apps using pentium-m and results were S-N-A-P-P-Y! :-)

Doing a make world on the kernel though trashed.
  


Ok, since nobody is actually bothering to _read_ article that I linked
to, let me quote a small piece:

Pentium M's Micro Ops Fusion, local branch prediction and general
optimizations across integer division and register access are completely
ignored by the compiler, even when setting - march=pentium-m, since most
compilers (particularly anything before GCC 3.4.2) tend to just
categorize Pentium M as a P6 processor with a higher clock. -Anandtech.com

From what I can tell from the change logs for GCC 3.4.2 and 3.4.3,
nothing has changed in this regard.

Anandtech.com might be completely wrong about GCC, but I would be _very_
surprised.  The article has many benchmarks for different types of
applications, if anyone is actually interested.

http://www.anandtech.com/linux/showdoc.aspx?i=2308

-Richard

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: Pentium M is actually quite good. (Was: Re: Laptop_Mode was[Re: [OT] Ext3 Speed Issues? (Was: Re: [gentoo-user] file system corrupted)])

2005-04-12 Thread Robert G. Hays

Richard Fish wrote:
Ok, since nobody is actually bothering to _read_ article that I linked
to, let me quote a small piece:
Hey!! -- I Resent That! -- *I* read the article, and I use AMD's!
And I read the whole thing, too,  *examined* the charts!
(Just so you know it wasn't wasted ;) -- Have a nice, )
Thanks,
rgh.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


Re: Pentium M is actually quite good. (Was: Re: Laptop_Mode was[Re: [OT] Ext3 Speed Issues? (Was: Re: [gentoo-user] file system corrupted)])

2005-04-11 Thread Richard Fish
Peter Gordon wrote:

 Jerry McBride wrote:

 Because I KNOW it works on AMD mobile chips, first hand. I've never
 even looked at Intel mobile processors Probably never will...


 Don't disregard the Pentium M so quickly. The Pentium4 is a _horrible_
 architecture: Intel wanted a CPU that could be clocked _very_ fast (I
 think the current top speed is ~3.4 GHz). However, the P4 can't really
 do a lot per cycle.


Intel is moving towards incorporating a lot of Pentium M features in
their desktop processors.  Unfortunately the results for Linux are
somewhat mixed...extra cache is good, but gcc treats it as a regular P4,
and misses out on a bunch of features.  Check out:

http://www.anandtech.com/linux/showdoc.aspx?i=2308

-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: Pentium M is actually quite good. (Was: Re: Laptop_Mode was[Re: [OT] Ext3 Speed Issues? (Was: Re: [gentoo-user] file system corrupted)])

2005-04-11 Thread Peter Gordon
Isn't that what the -march=pentium-m and -mtune=pentium-m flags are for in
GCC 3.4?
--
()  The ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML Email,
/\  vCards, and proprietary formats.
---
Peter A. Gordon (codergeek42)
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Public Key ID: 0x109DBECE
GPG Key Fingerprint (SHA1):
  E485 E2F7 11CE F9B2 E3D9 C95D 208F B732 109D BECE
Encrypted and/or Signed correspondence preffered.
GPG Public Key available upon request or from
  pgp.mit.edu's public key server.
---


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature