I saw this last night:
/usr/bin/eclean-dist
* Building file list for distfiles cleaning...
* Missing digest for '/usr/portage/dev-lang/swi-prolog/swi-
prolog-7.3.7.ebuild'
Does it need reporting or will it be OK on the next resync?
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 3:43 AM, Mick wrote:
> I saw this last night:
>
> /usr/bin/eclean-dist
> * Building file list for distfiles cleaning...
> * Missing digest for '/usr/portage/dev-lang/swi-prolog/swi-
> prolog-7.3.7.ebuild'
>
> Does it need reporting o
On Thursday 01 Oct 2015 11:53:09 Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 3:43 AM, Mick wrote:
> > I saw this last night:
> >
> > /usr/bin/eclean-dist
> >
> > * Building file list for distfiles cleaning...
> > * Missing digest for '/usr/port
Hi,
it seems, that swi-prolog and gnustep-base cannpot be installed in the
same time because both packages share the same file /usr/bin/pl
what is the best solution, to handle this situation?
Regards
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 23:21:01 +0100
Frank Schwidom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it seems, that swi-prolog and gnustep-base cannpot be installed in the
> same time because both packages share the same file /usr/bin/pl
>
> what is the best solution, to handle this situation?
file a bug at
a-check
>>
>>
>
>
> The only shared libraries that binutils includes are libbfd and
> libopcodes, and the only thing I could find on my system that linked
> against them outside of binutils was oprofile. Since oprofile isn't
> exactly a critical program,
-0.97.0 [0.95.0]
[ebuild U ] x11-drivers/xf86-video-tdfx-1.4.5 [1.4.4-r1]
[ebuild U ] x11-drivers/xf86-video-tga-1.2.2 [1.2.1]
[ebuild U ] dev-lang/swi-prolog-6.2.0 [5.10.5-r1] USE="static-libs%*
-archive%"
[ebuild U ] x11-drivers/xf86-video-r128-6.9.1 [6.8.2-r1]
[eb
7 matches
Mail list logo