Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia 6629 fail on 2.6.11.5
Using the latest nvidia [1.0.7174] builds has done the trick, I can use 2.6.11.5 and nvidia in X. I will have to wait and see on stability I guess, thx for the help chaps. stu ps. I had to fight with package.keywords for a while as the above instruction returned an "invalid atom" response when attempting to emerge, I found that the following syntax did the trick in the end. media-video/nvidia-glx -* media-video/nvidia-kernel -* On Apr 2, 2005 9:21 PM, Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stuart Howard wrote: > > thx for reply > > > > I found a few bugs but this one seems to match > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85802 > > > > I dont see a workaround at the moment so am falling back to 2.6.10 for > > a quiet life ;) > > There is a workaround: Don't use the inbuilt kernel AGPGART. (the nvidia > driver will install its own NvAGP driver instead) > > Daniel > -- > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list > > -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia 6629 fail on 2.6.11.5
Stuart Howard wrote: thx for reply I found a few bugs but this one seems to match http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85802 I dont see a workaround at the moment so am falling back to 2.6.10 for a quiet life ;) There is a workaround: Don't use the inbuilt kernel AGPGART. (the nvidia driver will install its own NvAGP driver instead) Daniel -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia 6629 fail on 2.6.11.5
Stuart Howard wrote: > thx for reply > > I found a few bugs but this one seems to match > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85802 > > I dont see a workaround at the moment so am falling back to 2.6.10 for > a quiet life ;) > > stu Or, you could try the newer nVidia drivers in ~x86. mkdir /etc/portage echo nvidia-kernel ~x86 >> /etc/portage/package.keywords echo nvidia-glx ~x86 >> /etc/portage/package.keywords emerge nvidia-kernel nvidia-glx -vua -- [Name ] :: [Matan I. Peled] [Location ] :: [Israel] [Public Key] :: [0xD6F42CA5] [Keyserver ] :: [keyserver.kjsl.com] encrypted/signed plain text preferred signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia 6629 fail on 2.6.11.5
thx for reply I found a few bugs but this one seems to match http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85802 I dont see a workaround at the moment so am falling back to 2.6.10 for a quiet life ;) stu On Apr 2, 2005 6:25 PM, fire-eyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 18:11 +0100, Stuart Howard wrote: > > Error 1 > > make[2]: *** > > [_module_/var/tmp/portage/nvidia-kernel-1.0.6629-r1/work/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv] > > Error 2 > > NVIDIA: left KBUILD. > > nvidia.ko failed to build! > > make[1]: *** [module] Error 1 > > make: *** [module] Error 2 > > Pretty sure I saw a bug on bugs.gentoo.org about this, though now I > can't seem to find it. > > I'd consider searching around at http://bugs.gentoo.org/query.cgi , use > the advanced search. > > -- > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list > > -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia 6629 fail on 2.6.11.5
On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 18:11 +0100, Stuart Howard wrote: > Error 1 > make[2]: *** > [_module_/var/tmp/portage/nvidia-kernel-1.0.6629-r1/work/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv] > Error 2 > NVIDIA: left KBUILD. > nvidia.ko failed to build! > make[1]: *** [module] Error 1 > make: *** [module] Error 2 Pretty sure I saw a bug on bugs.gentoo.org about this, though now I can't seem to find it. I'd consider searching around at http://bugs.gentoo.org/query.cgi , use the advanced search. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list