On Apr 1, 2013 2:10 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31/03/2013 20:26, Dale wrote:
Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
On 2013-03-31, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Pandu Poluan wrote:
Since it's obvious that upsteam has this my way or the highway
mentality, I'm
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 21:34:51 +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
What about USB network adaptors? A user may not even realise they
plugged it into a different USB slot from last time, yet the device
name changes.
Fair point but wouldn't that be only if you plug in two of the same
type that
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 03:02:51 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
What about USB network adaptors? A user may not even realise they
plugged it into a different USB slot from last time, yet the device
name changes.
congratulation, you just found another reason why today's udev sucks.
I take
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 15:40:09 +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
I find the OpenBSD method of different names like fxp0 usefuk
You can emulate that with suitable (e)udev rules.
--
Neil Bothwick
Computers are like Old Testament gods; lots of rules and no mercy.
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On Apr 1, 2013 1:54 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 21:34:51 +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
What about USB network adaptors? A user may not even realise they
plugged it into a different USB slot from last time, yet the device
name changes.
Fair point
Douglas J Hunley wrote:
Do you really need to copy the files into the kernel tree?
No, you don't need to do that.
which seems to pull in the daemon and the kmod so wouldn't the zfs-kmod
ebuild build against the current kernel and drop in the modules
directory all by itself much like any of
On Monday 01 Apr 2013 02:54:08 Philip Webb wrote:
I've spent a lot of today trying to fix a glitch in starting 'dhcpcd'
after upgrading to udev-200 ; I outlined it in a msg to gentoo-dev .
When I tried to start my I/net connection, I got this :
root:501 ~ dhcpcd
dhcpcd[831]:
On Monday 01 Apr 2013 04:37:50 luis jure wrote:
on 2013-03-31 at 23:05 Michael Mol wrote:
On 03/31/2013 10:00 PM, Philip Webb wrote:
There was a good story in 'Guardian' :
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/mar/29/cyberwar-spun-sho
ddy-journalism
The Gizmodo article
On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 13:57:42 +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
I still don't understand what's so bad with MAC-based identification? I
mean, uniqueness defined through MAC Address identity, the system name
is just a label...
MAC addresses are not human-friendly. It would be OK if you could set up
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 10:09:05 +0200, Remy Blank wrote:
Just ignore the section Installing into the kernel directory (for
static installs) on that page, unless you have a very special install
(but then, you probably wouldn't have to ask here).
Yes, you only need that if you want the modules
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 16:19:18 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
What the article didn't mention was that if you change your interface
names, you have to create a new symlink in /etc/init.d and add it to
the default runlevel. I'm glad I spotted that one before rebooting:)
So, just
ln -s
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 16:24:33 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
No, you only do that if the original is not available. Copy the whole
sys-fs/udev directory to your overlay then remove the files you don't
need
Well, that presupposes I know what files I need and what files I don't
need...
The
On 04/01/2013 09:12 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 13:57:42 +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
I still don't understand what's so bad with MAC-based identification? I
mean, uniqueness defined through MAC Address identity, the system name
is just a label...
MAC addresses are not
On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 14:12:17 +0100
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
I still don't understand what's so bad with MAC-based
identification? I mean, uniqueness defined through MAC Address
identity, the system name is just a label...
MAC addresses are not human-friendly. It would be
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 09:29:08 -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
MAC addresses are not human-friendly. It would be OK if you could set
up aliases, so your firewall rules could use enaabbccddeeff while you
could still type eth0.
Frankly, I never found 'eth0' to be particularly friendly, either.
On 04/01/2013 09:54 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 09:29:08 -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
MAC addresses are not human-friendly. It would be OK if you could set
up aliases, so your firewall rules could use enaabbccddeeff while you
could still type eth0.
Frankly, I never found
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
What do you mean by sane depclean? Are there any problems with
--depclean that I am not aware of?
emerge -p --depclean
generates dire warnings. I keep a previous version of the kernel
(gentoo-sources) as a
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 18:37:07 + (UTC)
Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt wrote:
On 2013-03-31, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
On 2013-03-31, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Pandu Poluan wrote:
Since it's obvious that upsteam has this
Look at bug 463550 [1]..
Either you downgrade to app-accessibility/speech-dispatcher-0.7.1-r2 or use
the patch which is pointed out at the bug.
mike
1) https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463550
On Monday 01 April 2013 20:57:43 Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
I'm unable to compile chromium.
130401 Mick wrote:
On Monday 01 Apr 2013 02:54:08 Philip Webb wrote:
I've spent a lot of today trying to fix a glitch in starting 'dhcpcd'
after upgrading to udev-200 ; I outlined it in a msg to gentoo-dev .
-- details snipped --
Thanks for sharing this Philip.
I was surprised to see that
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 10:09:05 +0200, Remy Blank wrote:
Just ignore the section Installing into the kernel directory (for
static installs) on that page, unless you have a very special install
(but then, you probably
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Michael Mair-Keimberger
m.mairkeimber...@gmail.com wrote:
Look at bug 463550 [1]..
Either you downgrade to app-accessibility/speech-dispatcher-0.7.1-r2 or use
the patch which is pointed out at the bug.
mike
1)
Am 01.04.2013 18:59, schrieb Nilesh Govindrajan:
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Michael Mair-Keimberger
m.mairkeimber...@gmail.com wrote:
Look at bug 463550 [1]..
Either you downgrade to app-accessibility/speech-dispatcher-0.7.1-r2 or use
the patch which is pointed out at the bug.
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 01:44:18PM -0500, Dale wrote:
Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
On 2013-03-31, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
On 2013-03-31, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Pandu Poluan wrote:
Since it's obvious that upsteam has this my way or
On 04/01/2013 03:26 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 01:44:18PM -0500, Dale wrote:
Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
On 2013-03-31, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
On 2013-03-31, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Pandu Poluan wrote:
Since it's
Michael Mol wrote:
On 04/01/2013 03:26 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 01:44:18PM -0500, Dale wrote:
Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
On 2013-03-31, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
On 2013-03-31, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Pandu Poluan
Am 01.04.2013 01:12, schrieb walt:
Any of you admin types out there have any grumpy thoughts about this
article? :) Is it really just marketing BS from cloudflare, or is it
solid stuff?
http://blog.cloudflare.com/the-ddos-that-almost-broke-the-internet
well, it was bad for spamhaus and
On Monday 01 April 2013 20:51:45 Michael Mol wrote:
---8
So, there are three conceivable configurations (initramfs
notwithstanding):
What a fine word! It's a while since I saw it last.
1. With systems which don't require /usr binaries before /usr would be
mounted, separate /usr is not a
28 matches
Mail list logo
